Skip to content

Conversation

graingert
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@graingert
Copy link
Contributor Author

For some reason I'm not getting emails about failing builds

@ierror
Copy link
Owner

ierror commented Jun 6, 2018

@graingert strange - not sure if it's a misconfiguration on my side?

@graingert
Copy link
Contributor Author

Probably just GDPR gone mad

@graingert
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ierror can you also have a look at this one?

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 20, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.4%) to 98.361% when pulling 29f1a55 on graingert:move-template-logic-to-view into c6af195 on ierror:develop.

@graingert
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ierror can you also have a look at this one?

@ierror
Copy link
Owner

ierror commented May 5, 2019

@graingert Apologies for the late reply. Can you please briefly explain why the

package.json

is needed? Otherwise the PR looks good and would be ready to merge. Thanks for that!

@graingert
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is for the webpack/npm version

@ierror
Copy link
Owner

ierror commented May 5, 2019

Is it okay for you if we remove the package.json for this PR and discuss the webpack/npm version separately?

@ierror ierror merged commit 29f1a55 into ierror:develop May 5, 2019
ierror added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2019
@graingert
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is it okay for you if we remove the package.json for this PR and discuss the webpack/npm version separately?

No that's not ok. JavaScript shouldn't be generated programmatically

@ierror
Copy link
Owner

ierror commented May 5, 2019

Is it okay for you if we remove the package.json for this PR and discuss the webpack/npm version separately?

No that's not ok. JavaScript shouldn't be generated programmatically

I agree but why should we mix up refactoring "move template logic to view" with a new feature?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants