-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments on layer0-node-type #6
Comments
Yes.
Right. Regarding the spectrum allocation (phase 1 of ietf-layer0-types), the iLA may not be needed. Then shall we remove the iLA in the current phase?
Propose to be just ROADM/FOADM, the key is 'whether reconfigurable or not'.
Well, G.694.1 defines the grid, but not the node. The node is defined somehow in G.680 (as optical network element) or in G.671 (OADM as a subsystem). It is proposed to change the layer0-node-type(to be l0-node-type)/wson-node-foadm/wson-node-roadm to G.671. The reference of identity flexi-grid-node is correct, should be G.694.1.
This is possible, and should be an implementation issue. It is possible that a TE node can either be one or multiple ROADM/FOADMs. The controller should be capable to locate the ROADM/FOADM(s) if there is any abstraction. |
Based on offline discussion, the conclusion is: For ietf-layer0-types, remove all the 5 identities, layer0-node-type, flexi-grid-node, wson-node-foadm, wson-node-roadm, wson-node-ila. |
This update solves the open issue #6 and #9 This update also solves the comments raised on the ccamp mailing list: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/qp4YJCYKx-pNaajY31XEis4nFS0/
This issue is resolved with 10acf68 I have linked this open issue with PR#3 so it will be automatically closed when the PR#3 is merged |
I have few doubts on the layer0-node-type identity, which defines four types of nodes: flexi-grid, WSON-FOADM. WSON-ROAM and WSON-iLA
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: