Annex F

[AnnaWall01]

Sweden suggest removal of Annex F from the S-102 PS. There is no need for this information in S-102.

We suggest either to

1. Remove the annex entirely from the PS or,
2. Keep the first page and the title and refer to document C-13 instead.

It has also been noted that some of the information in the annex is incorrect. Please see comments in the attached PDF, page no 63 to 65.

S-102 Ed.2.2_2023-04_commented (002).pdf

[RohdeBSH]

Hi @AnnaWall01,

We have no problem with removing Annex F.
You have our consent.

[tfilppula]

Also support removing annex F.

[giumas]

Support for removal of Annex F.
@AnnaWall01, what about Annex E? What is the point of having it without something concrete being worked on?

[AnnaWall01]

Decision at PT15 to remove Annex F from PS. @hasel001 if you can make the practical work of removing it from the PS?

[hasel001]

I will happily take on that action.

…

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 15:43 Anna Wall ***@***.***> wrote: Decision at PT15 to remove Annex F from PS. @hasel001 <https://github.com/hasel001> if you can make the practical work of removing it from the PS? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#61 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHSN2KRCHX6GRII4SQEIPQDYE4ISXAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5SC4DKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMJVHA4DENBWHE> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[hasel001]

I finally resolved this issue by making the appropriate changes this morning.