ctix fails when source file contains two exports to the same wildcard module declaration

[insidewhy]

Take this code which is typical for a project built with webpack:

/// <reference path="./DeclareTtfModule.d.ts" />
import RobotoBold from "./fonts/Roboto-Bold.ttf";
import Roboto from "./fonts/Roboto-Regular.ttf";

export { RobotoBold, Roboto };

and where DeclareTtfModule.d.ts looks like:

declare module "*.ttf";

Trying to compile a project like this exits with a non-zero status code and with the same error reported identically four times against the final line:

> detect same name of export statement: ""*.ttf""

Changing the final line so it only exports a single symbol works fine:

/// <reference path="./DeclareTtfModule.d.ts" />
import RobotoBold from "./fonts/Roboto-Bold.ttf";
import Roboto from "./fonts/Roboto-Regular.ttf";

export { RobotoBold }

Fixed this issue in #64

[imjuni]

@insidewhy Hi,

Thank you for your contribution!

I've improved your contribution a little bit. I think use compiler api that more accuracy for each situation.

as-is -> to-be

In this case, TypeScript Compiler API return module declaration node instance. And module declaration node return glob pattern applied name.

eg. Friend > *.ttf

So I module declaration node change that return export declaration key. It make information like that,

{
  identifier: 'Friend',
  isIsolatedModules: false,
  moduleDeclaration: "'*.ttf'",
},

This improvement can remove the need to change the duplicate detection code. If you agree with this change, I will release the next version in this state.

[insidewhy]

This improvement can remove the need to change the duplicate detection code. If you agree with this change, I will release the next version in this state.

I wanted to do that also, couldn't find a way to do it without changing a lot of other code. From getExported to getExport...

[imjuni]

@insidewhy Thank you for your kindness.

I completly agree changing only on validation logic. But I think that exportInfo result less about for validation. But I think the 'exportInfo' function doesn't return information to do the right validation.

Thank you for your feedback! I will release this version soon!

[insidewhy]

Thanks for releasing the fix so quickly.