Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ci): enable vendored openssl in normal build #47

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 16, 2024
Merged

fix(ci): enable vendored openssl in normal build #47

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 16, 2024

Conversation

kwaa
Copy link
Member

@kwaa kwaa commented Jun 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated .gitignore to exclude nix build results.
    • Uncommented openssl dependency in Cargo.toml.
    • Modified flake.nix to update nixpkgs integration and adjust OPENSSL handling.

@kwaa kwaa added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 16, 2024
@kwaa kwaa self-assigned this Jun 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates mainly focus on integrating OpenSSL and refining the flake.nix configurations. The introduction of OpenSSL ensures better handling of dependencies, while the adjustments in flake.nix provide a more structured toolchain definition and environment settings. Additionally, the .gitignore modifications improve build result management by ignoring specific files.

Changes

Files Change Summaries
.gitignore Added result to ignore in relation to nix build results.
Cargo.toml Uncommented the openssl dependency declaration.
flake.nix Modified perSystem function, restructured toolchain definition, and updated OPENSSL variables.

Poem

In code’s vast land, a heart took wing,
OpenSSL's security, the song to sing.
The flake.nix now set, the toolchain buffed,
With .gitignore, the builds stay unscuffed.
Cheers to these changes, simple yet grand,
A smoother code flow across the land.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e39ff3d and 6d3827f.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
  • flake.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (3)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • flake.nix (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .gitignore
  • Cargo.toml
Additional comments not posted (2)
flake.nix (2)

55-55: Setting OPENSSL_NO_VENDOR to true may affect how OpenSSL dependencies are handled, potentially leading to using system-provided OpenSSL instead of a vendored version. Confirm that this setting aligns with the security and compatibility goals of the project.

If the project requires specific OpenSSL features or versions, consider documenting these requirements and the rationale for not vendoring OpenSSL.


21-33: The restructuring of the toolchain configuration appears to simplify the setup by focusing on the minimal.toolchain instead of multiple specific targets. Ensure that this change aligns with project requirements for supported architectures.

Consider documenting the rationale behind focusing on minimal.toolchain and the implications for project support across different architectures.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6d3827f and b549a09.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • flake.nix (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • flake.nix

@kwaa kwaa merged commit 28d9392 into main Jun 16, 2024
1 check passed
@kwaa kwaa deleted the fix/cross branch June 16, 2024 00:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant