Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature request] integrate climate risk maps #77

Closed
SanderDevisscher opened this issue Jan 31, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #74
Closed

[Feature request] integrate climate risk maps #77

SanderDevisscher opened this issue Jan 31, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #74
Assignees

Comments

@SanderDevisscher
Copy link
Collaborator

SanderDevisscher commented Jan 31, 2024

Describe the solution you'd like
Some species have ready made climate risk maps. These maps should be placed under the more tab of the species page.

Currently these riskmaps reside here https://github.com/trias-project/risk-maps/tree/main and they are currently hosted here https://trias-project.github.io/risk-maps/.

From what I can understand of the naming of the files, the modeled data is stored as geotiffs in this folder "./public/geotiffs".
the naming convention is as follows: be__ followed by

appendix meaning
hist.4326.tif risk map of model based on historical climate data
hist_conf.4326.tif confidence map of model based on historical climate data
rcp%xy%.4326.tif risk map of model based on RCP %x.y% forecast of future climate between 2040-2070
rcp%xy%_conf.4326.tif confidence map of model based on RCP %x.y% forecast of the future climate between 2040-2070
rcp%xy%_diff.4326.tif difference map between the model based on historical climate data & the RCP %x.y% forecast of the future climate between 2040-2070

@mvarewyck can you look into how we can best integrate these "webpages" ?

note we hope to increase the number of species with a risk map.

@mvarewyck
Copy link
Collaborator

I tried to follow the same structure & options as the Trias tool.
@SanderDevisscher Trias tool also has these options, do we need any?

  • data layer opacity slider
  • show option: modelled data/occurrence data/both -> currently we only plot modelled data and show this tabpanel if there are modelled data (tif files)
  • overlays: none/ecoregions/bioregions/river basins -> currently we always show 'gewesten' layer like we do for all plots

Scenario 1: there are modelled data

Screenshot from 2024-02-06 14-36-52

Scenario 2: there are no modelled data

Screenshot from 2024-02-06 14-37-09

@SanderDevisscher
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mvarewyck This allready looks very good.
in case of species that miss all model data the option "risk maps" should not be activated.

@mvarewyck
Copy link
Collaborator

in case of species that miss all model data the option "risk maps" should not be activated.

to clarify:

  • if for the species there are no modelled data at all, the "risk maps" is not activated.
  • if for a species there are modelled data, but not for some specific scenarios (e.g. wrong tif file format, requesting difference while not selecting RCP scenario), there is a disclaimer as shown in 'Scenario 2' above

@SanderDevisscher
Copy link
Collaborator Author

SanderDevisscher commented Feb 6, 2024 via email

@SanderDevisscher SanderDevisscher linked a pull request Apr 18, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants