Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Determine a logical gbif records threshold #7

Closed
SanderDevisscher opened this issue Mar 31, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #6
Closed

Determine a logical gbif records threshold #7

SanderDevisscher opened this issue Mar 31, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #6
Assignees
Labels
climate matching question Further information is requested

Comments

@SanderDevisscher
Copy link
Collaborator

In the current climate matching outputs (see future & present - data overlays) contain all species with at least 1 record in the belgian climate zones (Cfa, Cfb & Dfb). A single/low number of record(s) can be an error, fluke, etc.... and can best be excluded from the list.

But a what number do we place the threshold ?

@timadriaens
Copy link
Contributor

timadriaens commented Mar 31, 2021

OK, I played around a bit with those. My proposal for criterium:

  • minimum number of occurrence records of the species on gbif (n_totaal): >=100 AND
  • degree of overlap (in %) with Belgian climate: >=10%

This should leave the following number of species:

  • current climate: 18 species
species Classification n_totaal %
Astacopsis gouldi Cfb 713 99
Austropotamobius pallipes Cfb 8222 94
Austropotamobius torrentium Dfb 410 96
Cambarus robustus Dfb 355 54
Cherax destructor Cfb 1410 43
Creaserinus fodiens Dfb 147 16
Engaeus granulatus Cfb 140 14
Euastacus armatus Cfb 396 47
Euastacus kershawi Cfb 219 99
Euastacus spinifer Cfb 190 53
Euastacus sulcatus Cfb 118 25
Euastacus yarraensis Cfb 173 94
Faxonius immunis Dfb 154 53
Faxonius propinquus Dfb 344 62
Faxonius rusticus Dfb 169 17
Faxonius virilis Dfb 615 39
Paranephrops planifrons Cfb 263 100
Spinastacoides inermis Cfb 192 93
  • future climate: 27 species
species Classification n_totaal %
Astacopsis gouldi Cfb 713 81
Austropotamobius torrentium Cfa 410 91
Cambaroides similis Cfa 156 19
Cambarus acuminatus Cfa 211 100
Cambarus hobbsorum Cfa 317 100
Cambarus latimanus Cfa 929 100
Cambarus longulus Cfa 147 100
Cambarus robustus Cfa 355 83
Cambarus striatus Cfa 487 100
Cambarus tenebrosus Cfa 158 100
Cherax destructor Cfa 1410 33
Creaserinus fodiens Cfa 147 91
Euastacus armatus Cfa 396 51
Euastacus kershawi Cfa 219 45
Euastacus spinifer Cfa 190 95
Euastacus sulcatus Cfa 118 98
Euastacus yarraensis Cfb 173 35
Faxonius immunis Cfa 154 66
Faxonius propinquus Cfa 344 39
Faxonius rusticus Cfa 169 67
Faxonius virilis Cfa 615 29
Lacunicambarus diogenes Cfa 332 94
Paranephrops planifrons Cfa 263 21
Procambarus gracilis Cfa 110 57
Procambarus spiculifer Cfa 291 100
Procambarus versutus Cfa 175 100
Spinastacoides inermis Cfb 192 100
  • current and future together: 16 species are common to both groups
species n_totaal current future
Astacopsis gouldi 713 Cfb Cfb
Austropotamobius torrentium 410 Dfb Cfa
Cambarus robustus 355 Dfb Cfa
Cherax destructor 1410 Cfb Cfa
Creaserinus fodiens 147 Dfb Cfa
Euastacus armatus 396 Cfb Cfa
Euastacus kershawi 219 Cfb Cfa
Euastacus spinifer 190 Cfb Cfa
Euastacus sulcatus 118 Cfb Cfa
Euastacus yarraensis 173 Cfb Cfb
Faxonius immunis 154 Dfb Cfa
Faxonius propinquus 344 Dfb Cfa
Faxonius rusticus 169 Dfb Cfa
Faxonius virilis 615 Dfb Cfa
Paranephrops planifrons 263 Cfb Cfa
Spinastacoides inermis 192 Cfb Cfb

@timadriaens
Copy link
Contributor

I find it striking though that none of the species occur twice in both climate classifications for Belgium.

@timadriaens
Copy link
Contributor

If we are a bit more severe on the criteria:

=150 records, 20% overlap

current: 14
future: 22
both: 13 species

=200 records, 20% overlap

current: 10
future: 15
both: 9 species

@adrienlatli can you take a look at the above list and tell us if that is workable? Do we want to land at around 30 spp to risk assess or do we go for less?

@adrienlatli
Copy link
Collaborator

Great Job Sander thx.

I think 30 spp to risk assess is realizable by Romain. This number could be improve if they find new species in shop but I'm think it's still feasible.
I need to present these results to Romain and Etienne and I will come back soon.

@timadriaens : If you can add Romain to Github it's must be usefull :-) (WILLEPUT Romain Romain.Willeput@ulb.be)

@timadriaens
Copy link
Contributor

ok! we need his github name for that

@timadriaens
Copy link
Contributor

@adrienlatli OK, calculating back from those 30 species I propose the following cut-offs (it appears the total number of records on gbif is more limiting than the degree of KG overlap):

  • n_totaal >= 90
  • perc_climate >= 0.20

This leaves exactly 30 species.

species

Astacopsis franklinii
Astacopsis gouldi
Austropotamobius torrentium
Cambarus acuminatus
Cambarus bartonii
Cambarus hobbsorum
Cambarus latimanus
Cambarus longirostris
Cambarus longulus
Cambarus robustus
Cambarus striatus
Cambarus tenebrosus
Cherax destructor
Creaserinus fodiens
Euastacus armatus
Euastacus kershawi
Euastacus spinifer
Euastacus sulcatus
Euastacus yarraensis
Faxonius immunis
Faxonius palmeri
Faxonius propinquus
Faxonius rusticus
Faxonius virilis
Lacunicambarus diogenes
Paranephrops planifrons
Procambarus gracilis
Procambarus spiculifer
Procambarus versutus
Spinastacoides inermis

@SanderDevisscher can you rerun using those selection criteria?

@SanderDevisscher
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ok! we need his github name for that

@adrienlatli can you provide his github username ?

SanderDevisscher added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 1, 2021
#7

Current thresholds: total number of gbif records at least 90 with at least 20% climate match
SanderDevisscher added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
climate matching question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants