-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HTML / Text only e-mails #27
Comments
Sigh. This is 2013, not 1993. Seriously, if people have an issue with HTML only email, then they're better off dropping off the internet. For a non-flippant response - yes, it's possible and I did it at the start but gave up as it was too much work maintaining a text and HTML version of the same email. HTML offers more features and nicer formatting. The stock HTML emails are simple HTML with no fancy formatting. This is not something that should exercise anyone to the degree that it can be considered a real problem (in, you know, 2013). |
Yes, understood. Geeks don't like it in our experience. It's not the HTML that is probably the issue, but that it's HTML only Many geeks connected here use a terminal based mail client like mutt Two users say they can't seem to render it properly: your html e-mail doesn't render as html btw
And/or classify it as spam to their lists, or won't open html only Rob Rob Lister |
html vs plaintext is a religious issue. Best to support both. Is there anything which can strip out tags from html source? That might be a relatively easy way of maintaining a single canonical version. |
The traditional way is to pipe it through lynx. |
Another comment received: Subject: new portal New portal idea is great but html only email is ta |
Rob - Implemented - see: https://github.com/opensolutions/OSS-Framework/wiki/OSS_Controller_Trait_Auth This is live on LONAP with the default of both. To limit to plaintext only, uncomment and set line 141 of |
Had a couple of moans about HTML only e-mails (for new user registrations etc)..
Is there a way to do text/plain only or have a text alternative?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: