Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SignKeyWithPeriodKES #389

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2023
Merged

SignKeyWithPeriodKES #389

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2023

Conversation

tdammers
Copy link
Contributor

This introduces a new type, SignKeyWithPeriodKES, which bundles a KES sign key with the KES period during which it is valid. This is largely a formality, but such a bundle is useful in that it allows us to keep KES keys associated with the correct period as they travel through the system, and have a KES evolution function (updateKESWithPeriod) that handles period and key together.

Depends on #388.

@tdammers tdammers force-pushed the tdammers/sign-key-with-period-kes branch from 5ccfa88 to f525dc5 Compare May 23, 2023 11:39
@tdammers tdammers force-pushed the tdammers/sign-key-with-period-kes branch from f525dc5 to d087e77 Compare August 24, 2023 07:48
@tdammers tdammers requested a review from lehins August 24, 2023 07:56
@lehins lehins force-pushed the tdammers/sign-key-with-period-kes branch from d087e77 to 45259cd Compare October 30, 2023 13:06
Copy link
Collaborator

@lehins lehins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a very nice simplification. Love it!

@tdammers tdammers force-pushed the tdammers/sign-key-with-period-kes branch from 45259cd to 6552416 Compare October 30, 2023 15:25
@tdammers tdammers merged commit 6451dde into master Oct 30, 2023
21 checks passed
@tdammers tdammers deleted the tdammers/sign-key-with-period-kes branch October 30, 2023 16:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants