-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
reduce the amount of spelling issues / WORDLIST #210
Conversation
hi @danielinteractive - this is not yet done, this is just Draft. There is still a bunch of list I'd like to fix in spelling. Once I'm done, I'll change this Draft to a PR and will ask you for a review. Is that OK? Or you just expressed your faith, that it's gonna be fine whathever I propose :)? |
Thanks @m7pr yep then just re-request review once final :-) I just meant to say any wordlist updates will be great. |
The final spelling check list is below. Most of the words are surnames, named-entities or shortcodes in DESCRIPTION file, or software-development like terms that are not yet in standard dictionaries used by hunspell.
|
Hey @danielinteractive - it's ready for your review |
Code Coverage Summary
Diff against main
Results for commit: 1b54358 Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
Hey @danielinteractive I did re-request your review as I made 2 changes/reverts after your comments. Thanks for the input! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @m7pr - I appreciate the effort from your side. I would suggest for the future, before jumping into any changes on our packages, let's have a quick chat to discuss the value of these changes so that we can optimize the efforts
will do, thanks for the cooperation |
The follow-up after https://github.com/insightsengineering/coredev-tasks/issues/235
Work in progress - the current output of
spelling::spell_check_package()