Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SYCL] Fix broken build after introduction USM to ocl headers #1852

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 10, 2020

Conversation

againull
Copy link
Contributor

@againull againull commented Jun 9, 2020

Signed-off-by: Artur Gainullin artur.gainullin@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Artur Gainullin <artur.gainullin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Artur Gainullin <artur.gainullin@intel.com>
@againull againull marked this pull request as ready for review June 10, 2020 00:01
@againull againull requested review from jbrodman, smaslov-intel and a team as code owners June 10, 2020 00:01
Copy link
Contributor

@bashbaug bashbaug left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - thanks!

@bader bader merged commit 4a8c432 into intel:sycl Jun 10, 2020
alexbatashev pushed a commit to alexbatashev/llvm that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2020
* upstream/sycl:
  [SYCL] Fix broken build after introduction USM to ocl headers (intel#1852)
  [SYCL][ESIMD] Implement "private globals" (file scope private vars)  in FE (intel#1756)
  [SYCL] Introduce interop handle for host task (intel#1747)
@againull againull deleted the fix branch December 3, 2022 00:02
FreddyLeaf pushed a commit to FreddyLeaf/llvm that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
The expected representation is:
target("spirv.JointMatrixINTEL", %element_type, %rows%, %cols%, %scope%,
%use%, (optional) %element_type_interpretation%)

TODO: figure out, how to deal with the switch from old API (Matrix has Layout) to new API (Layout was removed)

Depends on:
intel#1799
intel#8343

Original commit:
KhronosGroup/SPIRV-LLVM-Translator@ee03f5f
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants