Add PairInterface
#379
Merged
Add PairInterface
#379
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description & Motivation
The common case for an
Interfacedoes not require so much flexibility and would benefit from additional automation. ThePairInterfaceprovides this. See documentation in this PR for details.Also:
driveOther,receiveOther,conditionalDriveOther, andconditionalReceiveOtheras automation to assign signals between interface instances.@protectedtags onaddInputArrayandaddOutputArrayinModuleInterfaces wouldn't actually add aLogicArrayto theModule, just a port of the same width.Related Issue(s)
Fix #201
Testing
Added new tests
Backwards-compatibility
Not really, just bug fixes
Documentation
Yes, updated