Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GUI: hide postal address data of the contact objects #290

Closed
vohmar opened this issue Dec 14, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

GUI: hide postal address data of the contact objects #290

vohmar opened this issue Dec 14, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@vohmar
Copy link
Contributor

vohmar commented Dec 14, 2016

If system is configured with ignoring postal addresses the options to add this data should be hidden from the portal for registrars and epp web client

portal for registrars:

  • /registrar/contacts/new
  • /registrar/contacts/CONTACT:ID

in the info view it might be a good idea to replace the address box with contacts box that would include email and phone number as well so it is a matter of hiding unwanted data instead of the whole data area.

epp web client:
as the web client does not have access to server settings it is not possible to make addr fileds dynamic. But to support leaving postall address data blank some changes are still necessary. Please also solve this ticket:
internetee/EPP-web-client#15

@artur-intech
Copy link
Contributor

artur-intech commented Jan 3, 2017

internetee/EPP-web-client#9 is required as well.

@vohmar
Copy link
Contributor Author

vohmar commented Jan 3, 2017

updated the description on the part of web-client. Added reference to very lightly related ticket internetee/EPP-web-client#15

@artur-intech
Copy link
Contributor

"in the info view it might be a good idea to replace the address box with contacts box that would include email and phone number as well so it is a matter of hiding unwanted data instead of the whole data area."

There isn't much benefit of extracting only 2 fields into separate section. I think it is anyway a matter of separate ticket, if any change is needed.

@vohmar
Copy link
Contributor Author

vohmar commented Jan 17, 2017

in production, branch deleted, ticket closed

@vohmar vohmar closed this as completed Jan 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants