You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tried to use one of these symbols in a Requires statement in another RPM I'm building and it didn't work. Some digging showed that they weren't getting included in rpm file, e.g the output of:
It appears that the %description block swallows everything up until the next rpm section (e.g. %prep), or something like that.
I've placed them up after the Requires(postun): line and now they no longer appear in the %description section (phew) and have an effect.
Unfortunately, now I'm seeing a hard to reproduce bug in which rpath in incorrectly defined, resulting a failure to find libperl.so at runtime. I'll file another issue describing what I've narrowed down about that problem.
etc/perl.spec
includes these three lines after the%description
paragraph.I tried to use one of these symbols in a Requires statement in another RPM I'm building and it didn't work. Some digging showed that they weren't getting included in rpm file, e.g the output of:
did not include them.
However, they are included as the last three lines of the rpm's description, e.g. in the output of running:
It appears that the
%description
block swallows everything up until the next rpm section (e.g.%prep
), or something like that.I've placed them up after the
Requires(postun):
line and now they no longer appear in the%description
section (phew) and have an effect.Unfortunately, now I'm seeing a hard to reproduce bug in which
rpath
in incorrectly defined, resulting a failure to find libperl.so at runtime. I'll file another issue describing what I've narrowed down about that problem.The command line that I'm running is
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: