feat: update to awesome dag-pb #95
Conversation
daviddias
commented
Nov 23, 2016
daviddias
commented
daviddias
force-pushed
the
feat/awesome-dag-pb
branch
from
607b750
to
85acd78
Compare
|
|
||
| series([ | ||
| (cb) => { | ||
| node1.addNodeLink('some-link', node2, cb) | ||
| DAGNode(new Buffer('Some data 1'), (err, node) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this be DAGNode.create()?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
absolutely correct, missed 2
| }, | ||
| (cb) => { | ||
| ipfs.object.put(node1, (err, node) => { | ||
| DAGNode(new Buffer('Some data 2'), (err, node) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this be DAGNode.create()?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
thank you, just fixed now with more testing :)
|
Couple of questions. Otherwise looks good to me 👍 |
| node2 = node | ||
| cb() | ||
| }) | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same as in ipld/js-ipld#67 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
True, it can save us some lines, however, I don't dislike how it is right now, it makes it very easy to read (I believe). Just for the sake of time (and wanting to have this before the hackathon), will leave this reconsideration for after.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I find it super hard to read :/ as it is spread on so many lines that I have difficulty figuring out what is actually happening
| node2 = node | ||
| cb() | ||
| }) | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same as in ipld/js-ipld#67 (comment)
| expect(err).to.not.exist | ||
| node2 = node | ||
| cb() | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same as in Same as in ipld/js-ipld#67 (comment)
daviddias
force-pushed
the
feat/awesome-dag-pb
branch
from
85acd78
to
519c944
Compare
|
Thank you for the review :) |
