You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently most tests that exercise the integration of Boxo components are in Kubo. This causes Boxo releases to take longer and be more complicated, since changes have to be tested in Kubo before the release. It also creates a much longer feedback loop on Boxo changes.
Many of the "sharness" tests and integration tests in Kubo should be integration tests in Boxo, and Kubo tests should be reduced to testing that we are using Boxo correctly and that Kubo-specific features work correctly.
This issue needs to be scoped out more, with a specific "definition of done".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently most tests that exercise the integration of Boxo components are in Kubo. This causes Boxo releases to take longer and be more complicated, since changes have to be tested in Kubo before the release. It also creates a much longer feedback loop on Boxo changes.
Many of the "sharness" tests and integration tests in Kubo should be integration tests in Boxo, and Kubo tests should be reduced to testing that we are using Boxo correctly and that Kubo-specific features work correctly.
This issue needs to be scoped out more, with a specific "definition of done".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: