You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would adding the -z option (lazy unmounting) make any sense? if something accesses the fuse mounts and one kills the daemon there are still lingering mounts left behind, preventing a restart.
The only problem I see would be that it could shadow other bugs leaving the filesystem mounted, but all other umount command either do their job, block or report an error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah... fuse is tricky that way. I'd really like to move towards running the fuse mount as a separate process, independent of the daemon (although it wouldnt function properly without the daemon running).
Would adding the -z option (lazy unmounting) make any sense? if something accesses the fuse mounts and one kills the daemon there are still lingering mounts left behind, preventing a restart.
The only problem I see would be that it could shadow other bugs leaving the filesystem mounted, but all other umount command either do their job, block or report an error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: