Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2020. It is now read-only.

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

ipfs-repo just published its new version 0.11.2.

State Failing tests ⚠️
Dependency ipfs-repo
New version 0.11.2
Type devDependency

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build kept failing.

It looks like your project, in its current form, is malfunctioning and this update didn’t really change that. I don’t want to leave you in the dark about updates though. I recommend you get your project passing and then check the impact of this update again.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 10 commits .

  • 73ca859 chore: release version v0.11.2
  • ede55b2 chore: update contributors
  • 7a8a089 chore: update ipfs-block, fixes #108 (#109)
  • fe76115 chore(package): update pre-commit to version 1.2.0 (#106)
  • 85a0f3f chore(package): update aegir to version 9.2.1 (#107)
  • 8dc3af5 docs: fix install section
  • c2c76d7 fix: example
  • e31823b Fix code sample (#105)
  • a9cc33a chore(package): update async to version 2.1.4 (#103)
  • 2c0d7cf chore(package): update multihashes to version 0.3.0 (#104)

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@daviddias daviddias closed this Dec 15, 2016
@daviddias daviddias deleted the greenkeeper-ipfs-repo-0.11.2 branch December 15, 2016 06:21
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants