Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 29, 2020. It is now read-only.

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

libp2p-ipfs just published its new version 0.14.1.

State Update 🚀
Dependency libp2p-ipfs
New version 0.14.1
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of libp2p-ipfs.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 3 commits .

  • 3ec7435 chore: release version v0.14.1
  • dc53057 chore: update contributors
  • 3ec8d55 feat(examples): examples interop with go

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 14, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 75.0% when pulling 3b82cdb on greenkeeper-libp2p-ipfs-0.14.1 into 3fd04c8 on master.

@daviddias daviddias merged commit c80b9c8 into master Sep 14, 2016
@daviddias daviddias deleted the greenkeeper-libp2p-ipfs-0.14.1 branch September 14, 2016 18:01
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants