-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Symbolic Links #616
Labels
topic/files
Topic files
Comments
As far as ipfs add is concerned, we could do two things:
In any case, I think this should be configurable by a command line switch. Just like we have |
Agreed with your analysis @mildred, as discussed in #620 let's:
|
@whyrusleeping Can we make getting symlinks working a priority? |
@diasdavid sure thing. |
Kachow! |
💥 :D |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Symbolic links are not implemented.
ipfs add -r
on a directory containing a symlink to a directory will fail.You can reproduce it using:
You get:
I think I also got
ipfs add -r
to stop in the middle of adding because of that. At some point, it would just stop and not continue. Running stat, I found that it thought that the symlink to a directory was a file, and tried to read it:The normal sequence for a directory would be:
We should implement symbolic links in the unixfs protocol buffer object.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: