This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 23, 2022. It is now read-only.
Add autoconf scripts as per suggestion from Heasley #54
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:42:34AM -0700, Job Snijders:
@job requested your review on: irrdnet/irrd-legacy#54 Add autoconf scripts as per suggestion from Heasley.
--
You are receiving this because your review was requested.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#54 (comment)
almost. See f4f67ee, which I git-bumbled having meant to put it on a branch.
oh well. But, you also need to descide what to do with the version number(s).
|
|
Committed by heas |
|
Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:28:22PM -0700, Job Snijders:
Closed #54.
you still need to descide what to do with the version number(s). do you
want major.minor.mini or the git hash or something else?
|
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In relation to what you brought up in #53 is this PR what you mean?