Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
494 lines (374 loc) · 18.6 KB

08-templated-components.md

File metadata and controls

494 lines (374 loc) · 18.6 KB
Raw

Templated components

Let's refactor some of the original components and make them more reusable. Along the way we'll also create a separate library project as a home for the new components.

We're going to create a new project using the Razor Class Library template.

Creating a component library (Visual Studio)

Using Visual Studio, right click on Solution at the very top of solution explorer, and choose Add->New Project.

Then, select the Razor Class Library template.

image

Enter the project name BlazingComponents and click Create.

Creating a component library (command line)

To make a new project using dotnet run the following commands from the directory where your solution file exists.

dotnet new razorclasslib -o BlazingComponents
dotnet sln add BlazingComponents

This should create a new project called BlazingComponents and add it to the solution file.

Understanding the library project

Open the project file by double-clicking on the BlazingComponents project name in Solution explorer. We're not going to modify anything here, but it would be good to understand a few things.

It looks like:

<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Razor">

  <PropertyGroup>
    <TargetFramework>netstandard2.0</TargetFramework>
    <RazorLangVersion>3.0</RazorLangVersion>
  </PropertyGroup>

  <ItemGroup>
    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components" Version="3.1.3" />
    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.Web" Version="3.1.3" />
  </ItemGroup>

</Project>

There are a few things here worth understanding.

Firstly, the package targets netstandard2.0. Blazor Server uses netcoreapp3.1 and Blazor WebAssembly uses netstandard2.1 - so targeting netstandard2.0 means that it will work for either scenario.

Additional, the <RazorLangVersion>3.0</RazorLangVersion> sets the Razor language version. Version 3 is needed to support components and the .razor file extension.

Lastly the <PackageReference /> element adds a package references to the Blazor component model.

Writing a templated dialog

We are going to revisit the dialog system that is part of Index and turn it into something that's decoupled from the application.

Let's think about how a reusable dialog should work. We would expect a dialog component to handle showing and hiding itself, as well as maybe styling to appear visually as a dialog. However, to be truly reusable, we need to be able to provide the content for the inside of the dialog. We call a component that accepts content as a parameter a templated component.

Blazor happens to have a feature that works for exactly this case, and it's similar to how a layout works. Recall that a layout has a Body parameter, and the layout gets to place other content around the Body. In a layout, the Body parameter is of type RenderFragment which is a delegate type that the runtime has special handling for. The good news is that this feature is not limited to layouts. Any component can declare a parameter of type RenderFragment. We've also used this feature extensively in App.razor. All of the components used to handle routing and authorization are templated components.

Let's get started on this new dialog component. Create a new component file named TemplatedDialog.razor in the BlazingComponents project. Put the following markup inside TemplatedDialog.razor:

<div class="dialog-container">
    <div class="dialog">

    </div>
</div>

This doesn't do anything yet because we haven't added any parameters. Recall from before the two things we want to accomplish.

  1. Accept the content of the dialog as a parameter
  2. Render the dialog conditionally if it is supposed to be shown

First, add a parameter called ChildContent of type RenderFragment. The name ChildContent is a special parameter name, and is used by convention when a component wants to accept a single content parameter.

@code {
    [Parameter] public RenderFragment ChildContent { get; set; }
}

Next, update the markup to render the ChildContent in the middle of the markup. It should look like this:

<div class="dialog-container">
    <div class="dialog">
        @ChildContent
    </div>
</div>

If this structure looks weird to you, cross-check it with your layout file, which follows a similar pattern. Even though RenderFragment is a delegate type, the way to render it not by invoking it, it's by placing the value in a normal expression so the runtime may invoke it.

Next, to give this dialog some conditional behavior, let's add a parameter of type bool called Show. After doing that, it's time to wrap all of the existing content in an @if (Show) { ... }. The full file should look like this:

@if (Show)
{
    <div class="dialog-container">
        <div class="dialog">
            @ChildContent
        </div>
    </div>
}

@code {
    [Parameter] public RenderFragment ChildContent { get; set; }
    [Parameter] public bool Show { get; set; }
}

Build the solution and make sure that everything compiles at this stage. Next we'll get down to using this new component.

Adding a reference to the templated library

Before we can use this component in the BlazingPizza.Client project, we will need to add a project reference. Do this by adding a project reference from BlazingPizza.Client to BlazingComponents.

Once that's done, there's one more minor step. Open the _Imports.razor in the topmost directory of BlazingPizza.Client and add this line at the end:

@using BlazingComponents

Now that the project reference has been added, do a build again to verify that everything still compiles.

Another refactor

Recall that our TemplatedDialog contains a few divs. Well, this duplicates some of the structure of ConfigurePizzaDialog. Let's clean that up. Open ConfigurePizzaDialog.razor; it currently looks like:

<div class="dialog-container">
    <div class="dialog">
        <div class="dialog-title">
        ...
        </div>
        <form class="dialog-body">
        ...
        </form>

        <div class="dialog-buttons">
        ...
        </div>
    </div>
</div>

We should remove the outermost two layers of div elements since those are now part of the TemplatedDialog component. After removing these it should look more like:

<div class="dialog-title">
...
</div>
<form class="dialog-body">
...
</form>

<div class="dialog-buttons">
...
</div>

Using the new dialog

We'll use this new templated component from Index.razor. Open Index.razor and find the block of code that looks like:

@if (OrderState.ShowingConfigureDialog)
{
    <ConfigurePizzaDialog
        Pizza="OrderState.ConfiguringPizza"
        OnConfirm="OrderState.ConfirmConfigurePizzaDialog"
        OnCancel="OrderState.CancelConfigurePizzaDialog" />
}

We are going to remove this and replace it with an invocation of the new component. Replace the block above with code like the following:

<TemplatedDialog Show="OrderState.ShowingConfigureDialog">
    <ConfigurePizzaDialog 
        Pizza="OrderState.ConfiguringPizza" 
        OnCancel="OrderState.CancelConfigurePizzaDialog" 
        OnConfirm="OrderState.ConfirmConfigurePizzaDialog" />
</TemplatedDialog>

This is wiring up our new TemplatedDialog component to show and hide itself based on OrderState.ShowingConfigureDialog. Also, we're passing in some content to the ChildContent parameter. Since we called the parameter ChildContent any content that is placed inside the <TemplatedDialog> </TemplatedDialog> will be captured by a RenderFragment delegate and passed to TemplatedDialog.

Note: A templated component may have multiple RenderFragment parameters. What we're showing here is a convenient convention when the caller wants to provide a single RenderFragment that represents the main content.

At this point it should be possible to run the code and see that the new dialog works correctly. Verify that this is working correctly before moving on to the next step.

A more advanced templated component

Now that we've done a basic templated dialog, we're going to try something more sophisticated. Recall that the MyOrders.razor page shows a list of orders, but it also contains three-state logic (loading, empty list, and showing items). If we could extract that logic into a reusable component, would that be useful? Let's give it a try.

Start by creating a new file TemplatedList.razor in the BlazingComponents project. We want this list to have a few features:

  1. Async-loading of any type of data
  2. Separate rendering logic for three states - loading, empty list, and showing items

We can solve async loading by accepting a delegate of type Func<Task<IEnumerable<?>>> - we need to figure out what type should replace ?. Since we want to support any kind of data, we need to declare this component as a generic type. We can make a generic-typed component using the @typeparam directive, so place this at the top of TemplatedList.razor.

@typeparam TItem

Making a generic-typed component works similarly to other generic types in C#, in fact @typeparam is just a convenient Razor syntax for a generic .NET type.

Note: We don't yet have support for type-parameter-constraints. This is something we're looking to add in the future.

Now that we've defined a generic type parameter we can use it in a parameter declaration. Let's add a parameter to accept a delegate we can use to load data, and then load the data in a similar fashion to our other components.

@code {
    IEnumerable<TItem> items;

    [Parameter] public Func<Task<IEnumerable<TItem>>> Loader { get; set; }

    protected override async Task OnParametersSetAsync()
    {
        items = await Loader();
    }
}

Since we have the data, we can now add the structure of each of the states we need to handle. Add the following markup to TemplatedList.razor:

@if (items == null)
{

}
else if (!items.Any())
{
}
else
{
    <div class="list-group">
        @foreach (var item in items)
        {
            <div class="list-group-item">
                
            </div>
        }
    </div>
}

Now, these are our three states of the dialog, and we'd like to accept a content parameter for each one so the caller can plug in the desired content. We do this by defining three RenderFragment parameters. Since we have multiple RenderFragment parameters we'll just give each one their own descriptive names instead of calling them ChildContent. The content for showing an item needs to take a parameter. We can do this by using RenderFragment<T>.

Here's an example of the three parameters to add:

    [Parameter] public RenderFragment Loading{ get; set; }
    [Parameter] public RenderFragment Empty { get; set; }
    [Parameter] public RenderFragment<TItem> Item { get; set; }

Now that we have some RenderFragment parameters, we can start using them. Update the markup we created earlier to plug in the correct parameter in each place.

@if (items == null)
{
    @Loading
}
else if (!items.Any())
{
    @Empty
}
else
{
    <div class="list-group">
        @foreach (var item in items)
        {
            <div class="list-group-item">
                @Item(item)
            </div>
        }
    </div>
}

The Item accepts a parameter, and the way to deal with this is just to invoke the function. The result of invoking a RenderFragment<T> is another RenderFragment which can be rendered directly.

The new component should compile at this point, but there's still one thing we want to do. We want to be able to style the <div class="list-group"> with another class, since that's what MyOrders.razor is doing. Adding small extensibiliy points to plug in additional css classes can go a long way for reusability.

Let's add another string parameter, and finally the functions block of TemplatedList.razor should look like:

@code {
    IEnumerable<TItem> items;

    [Parameter] public Func<Task<IEnumerable<TItem>>> Loader { get; set; }
    [Parameter] public RenderFragment Loading { get; set; }
    [Parameter] public RenderFragment Empty { get; set; }
    [Parameter] public RenderFragment<TItem> Item { get; set; }
    [Parameter] public string ListGroupClass { get; set; }

    protected override async Task OnParametersSetAsync()
    {
        items = await Loader();
    }
}

Lastly update the <div class="list-group"> to contain <div class="list-group @ListGroupClass">. The complete file of TemplatedList.razor should now look like:

@typeparam TItem

@if (items == null)
{
    @Loading
}
else if (!items.Any())
{
    @Empty
}
else
{
    <div class="list-group @ListGroupClass">
        @foreach (var item in items)
        {
            <div class="list-group-item">
                @Item(item)
            </div>
        }
    </div>
}

@code {
    IEnumerable<TItem> items;

    [Parameter] public Func<Task<IEnumerable<TItem>>> Loader { get; set; }
    [Parameter] public RenderFragment Loading { get; set; }
    [Parameter] public RenderFragment Empty { get; set; }
    [Parameter] public RenderFragment<TItem> Item { get; set; }
    [Parameter] public string ListGroupClass { get; set; }

    protected override async Task OnParametersSetAsync()
    {
        items = await Loader();
    }
}

Using TemplatedList

To use the new TemplatedList component, we're going to edit MyOrders.razor.

First, we need to create a delegate that we can pass to the TemplatedList that will load order data. We can do this by keeping the code that's in MyOrders.OnParametersSetAsync and changing the method signature. The @code block should look something like:

@code {
    async Task<IEnumerable<OrderWithStatus>> LoadOrders()
    {
        var ordersWithStatus = Enumerable.Empty<OrderWithStatus>();
        try
        {
            ordersWithStatus = await OrdersClient.GetOrders();
        }
        catch (AccessTokenNotAvailableException ex)
        {
            ex.Redirect();
        }
        return ordersWithStatus;
    }
}

This matches the signature expected by the Loader parameter of TemplatedList, it's a Func<Task<IEnumerable<?>>> where the ? is replaced with OrderWithStatus so we are on the right track.

You can use the TemplatedList component now like so:

<div class="main">
    <TemplatedList>
    </TemplatedList>
</div>

The compiler will complain about not knowing the generic type of TemplatedList. The compiler is smart enough to perform type inference like normal C# but we haven't given it enough information to work with.

Adding the Loader attribute should fix the issue.

<div class="main">
    <TemplatedList Loader="@LoadOrders">
    </TemplatedList>
</div>

Note: A generic-typed component can have its type-parameters manually specified as well by setting the attribute with a matching name to the type parameter - in this case it's called TItem. There are some cases where this is necessary so it's worth knowing.

<div class="main">
    <TemplatedList TItem="OrderWithStatus">
    </TemplatedList>
</div>

We don't need to do this right now because the type can be inferred from Loader.

Next, we need to think about how to pass multiple content (RenderFragment) parameters to a component. We've learned using TemplatedDialog that a single [Parameter] RenderFragment ChildContent can be set by nesting content inside the component. However this is just a convenient syntax for the most simple case. When you want to pass multiple content parameters, you can do this by nesting elements inside the component that match the parameter names.

For our TemplatedList here's an example that sets each parameter to some dummy content:

<div class="main">
    <TemplatedList Loader="@LoadOrders">
        <Loading>Hi there!</Loading>
        <Empty>
            How are you?
        </Empty>
        <Item>
            Are you enjoying Blazor?
        </Item>
    </TemplatedList>
</div>

The Item parameter is a RenderFragment<T> - which accepts a parameter. By default this parameter is called context. If we type inside of <Item> </Item> then it should be possible to see that @context is bound to a variable of type OrderStatus. We can rename the parameter by using the Context attribute:

<div class="main">
    <TemplatedList Loader="@LoadOrders">
        <Loading>Hi there!</Loading>
        <Empty>
            How are you?
        </Empty>
        <Item Context="item">
            Are you enjoying Blazor?
        </Item>
    </TemplatedList>
</div>

Now we want to include all of the existing content from MyOrders.razor, so putting it all together should look more like the following:

<div class="main">
    <TemplatedList Loader="@LoadOrders" ListGroupClass="orders-list">
        <Loading>Loading...</Loading>
        <Empty>
            <h2>No orders placed</h2>
            <a class="btn btn-success" href="">Order some pizza</a>
        </Empty>
        <Item Context="item">
            <div class="col">
                <h5>@item.Order.CreatedTime.ToLongDateString()</h5>
                Items:
                <strong>@item.Order.Pizzas.Count()</strong>;
                Total price:
                <strong>£@item.Order.GetFormattedTotalPrice()</strong>
            </div>
            <div class="col">
                Status: <strong>@item.StatusText</strong>
            </div>
            <div class="col flex-grow-0">
                <a href="myorders/@item.Order.OrderId" class="btn btn-success">
                    Track &gt;
                </a>
            </div>
        </Item>
    </TemplatedList>
</div>

Notice that we're also setting the ListGroupClass parameter to add the additional styling that was present in the original MyOrders.razor.

There were a number of steps and new features to introduce here. Run this and make sure that it works correctly now that we're using the templated list.

To prove that the list is really working correctly we can try the following:

  1. Delete the pizza.db from the Blazor.Server project to test the case where there are no orders
  2. Add an await Task.Delay(3000); to LoadOrders (also marking that method as async) to test the case where we're still loading

Summary

So what have we seen in this session?

  1. It's possible to write components that accept content as a parameter - even multiple content parameters
  2. Templated components can be used to abstract things, like showing a dialog, or async loading of data
  3. Components can be generic types, which makes them more reusable

Next up - Progressive web app