Fix #140: On enums and scope.

[ciechowoj]

As is the title.

[jacob-carlborg]

items -> members.

[ciechowoj]

Renamed.

[jacob-carlborg]

Here as well.

[ciechowoj]

Sigh...
Extended the commit message as well.

[jacob-carlborg]

👌.

[jacob-carlborg]

Could you please create a PR that updates the changelog with the PRs I just merged. I merged them a bit too quickly 😃.

[ciechowoj]

Sure.

[jacob-carlborg]

I just noticed that the following code:

struct Foo
{
    enum Bar
    {
        asd
    };
};

Incorrectly translates, with the new --alias-enum-members flag, to:

extern (C):

struct Foo
{
    enum Bar
    {
        asd = 0
    }
}

alias asd = Bar.asd;

The alias should be placed in the parent scope not the global scope.

[jacob-carlborg]

Here's a better example which gives no warnings:

struct Foo
{
    enum Bar
    {
        asd
    } bar;
};

[ciechowoj]

The alias should be placed in the parent scope not the global scope.

No, in C enums are exported to global scope.

e.g.

#include <stdio.h>

struct Foo
{
    enum Bar
    {
        asd = 1
    };
};


int main() {
	printf("%d", asd);
	return 0;
}

This compiles fine and prints 1.

Anyway it should be alias asd = Foo.Bar.asd;

[jacob-carlborg]

Ah, I was running the C++ compiler, not the C compiler. My bad.