You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Having more search results would be easy to implement, but it exposes another flaw: the eomji reaction system is not well suited for lists greater than for ex, 2
. Thus, I propose 2 changes: A configurable number of search results, and a purely text based selection system. Everything is already based around typing, why not make that the exlclusive option for track selection.
How would this feature be used?
People would be able to view more search results.
Additional Info
No response
Checklist
I have checked the documentation to make sure this feature doesn't already exist
Just for reference, you already can use text-based inputs to make your selection from the search results: you can type the number of the result to make your selection.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Having more search results would be easy to implement, but it exposes another flaw: the eomji reaction system is not well suited for lists greater than for ex, 2
Related: #758
What is your ideal solution to the problem?
. Thus, I propose 2 changes: A configurable number of search results, and a purely text based selection system. Everything is already based around typing, why not make that the exlclusive option for track selection.
How would this feature be used?
People would be able to view more search results.
Additional Info
No response
Checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: