Skip to content

On The Evolving Definition of Players in the Nash Program

jal edited this page Apr 26, 2024 · 4 revisions

Here we will collect and update past and current evolving definitions of players for the Nash program and our re-maption of it. Our mapation and evolution suggest that the definition of players is to be re-considered at each halvening event of Bitcoin.

Our observation here is that when Bohmian hidden variable theory is considered, also with regard to our consensus field theory the formation, and also Nash cooperation or coalition considerations (where agency can be used to reduce games of n players down to those of 2 or 3 players in a bargaining situation) of a 'player', there is then both the considerations of the effects of consensus formation (ie if consensus decides either 0 or 1) on what the definitions of players are and also on the fluxation of the definitions themselves (as if observing cultural impacts of migration rather than a change of borders per se).

This observation maps well with the homotophic approach/method intrinsic to the Nash program and is a critical consideration for the Bohrian consensus proposal.

Home

Home

Ideal Money Versions by John Nash

Global Games and “Globalization” by John Nash

Hierarchical Introspective Logics by John Nash

The Nashian Orientation of Bitcoin

Ideal Poker

Bip

Nashian Orientation vs Drivechains

nashLinter chatGPT Agent

nashLinterGPT Demo

Linter Knowledge

The following is written to be read in descending order and also doubles as the modules for our nashLinterAgent:

  1. Bitcoin Most Certainly Violates Mises Regression Theorem and This Fact Compels Clarification or Re‐Solution from the Mises Institute; And An Introduction to Szabonian Deconstruction
  2. Of The Fatal Inconsistencies In Saifedean Ammous' Bitcoin Standard
  3. On Terminating Bitcoin's Violation of Mises Regression Theorem With Games as Pre‐Market Commodity Valuators
  4. On the Szabonian Deconstruction of Money and Gresham's Law
  5. The Bitcoin Community is a Sybil Attack On Bitcoin
  6. On The Satoshi Complex
  7. On Cantillon and the Szabonian Deconstruction of the Cantillon Effect
  8. Understanding Hayek Via Our Szabonian Deconstruction of Cantillon
  9. On the Tools and Metaphors Necessary To Properly Traverse Hayek’s Denationalization of Money In the Face and Light of Bitcoin
  10. On the Sharpening of the Tools Necessary As a Computational Shortcut for Understanding Hayek’s Proposal The Denationalization of Money in The Context of the Existence of Bitcoin
  11. Our Tool for Szabonian Deconstruction of Highly Evolved Religions
  12. Thought Systems As Inputs For Turing Machines‐Our Tool For Framing Metaphors Of Intersubjective Truths
  13. On the Szabonian Metaphorical Framework For Objectively Traversing the Complex History of Mankind
  14. On the Synthesis and Formalization of Hayek, Nash, And Szabo’s Proposals For The Optimization of The Existing Global Legacy Currency Systems
  15. On The Re‐Solution of Central Banking and Hayekian Landscapes

Extra (these aren't added to the demo yet)


ChatGTP rheomodeLinguistAgent

rheomodeLinguist GTPAgent Demo

Bohmian Rheomode Modules


Rheomode Construction Examples


Quantum Curiosity (the Schrodinger's Cat) LLM Agent Modules


Nash Cooperation




Protocols etc.

Chomsky

Nash Program Upgrade

The Chomsky Primitive and It's Relevance and Significance To Bitcoin

Bohm

New

Clone this wiki locally