Methods for determining the variant type #31
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Scheduled for next release unless anyone raises an objection? |
jamescasbon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2012
Methods for determining the variant type
gotgenes
pushed a commit
to gotgenes/PyVCF
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2014
Methods for determining the variant type
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi James,
I added a bunch of new methods (and associated tests) for assessing the
type(e.g. "snp", "indel", "unknown") andsub_type(e.g., "ts", "tv", "ins", "del") of a variantRecord. These attributes depend on some helper functions that I added:is_snp,is_indel,is_transition,is_deletion. Future work will be to support SVs.I hope this helps. Let me know if you have any comments or concerns.