Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix calculation based on Mookerjee erratum #4

Closed
jamespeapen opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5
Closed

Fix calculation based on Mookerjee erratum #4

jamespeapen opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@jamespeapen
Copy link
Owner

coupled_mito_resp <- (basal_mito_resp - uncoupled_mito_resp) * HYPERPOLARIZATION_CONSTANT

“OCRcoupled x 0.908”. This operation was actually an error in the original publication; an erratum was published with the correct operation, which should be “OCRcoupled / 0.908”: DOI: 10.1074/jbc.AAC118.004855.
@jamespeapen jamespeapen added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 30, 2024
jamespeapen added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2024
@jamespeapen
fix(energetics): fix the coupled_mito_resp calculation
f59c098 
Original calculation was corrected in erratum
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.aac118.004855

Resolves #4
@jamespeapen jamespeapen linked a pull request Feb 13, 2024 that will close this issue
fix(energetics): fix the coupled_mito_resp calculation #5
Merged
jamespeapen added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2024
@jamespeapen
fix(energetics): fix the coupled_mito_resp calculation
87a9d8a 
Original calculation was corrected in erratum
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.aac118.004855

Resolves #4
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

fix(energetics): fix the coupled_mito_resp calculation jamespeapen/ceas
1 participant
@jamespeapen