Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: improve validation of Git credentials request #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2024

Conversation

jamestelfer
Copy link
Collaborator

@jamestelfer jamestelfer commented May 8, 2024

Reject obviously malformed requests, and don't try to add details if they're missing.

Git credentials helpers are invoked by Git with a defined and stable protocol. Anything outside this shouldn't be handled, instead rejecting as cheaply as possible.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new function for constructing repository URLs based on specific properties.
  • Refactor
    • Improved the handling of repository URLs and error responses in Git credential management.
    • Enhanced error logging for better troubleshooting.
  • Tests
    • Added tests to ensure the correct construction of repository URLs under various scenarios.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes in the chinmina-bridge project focus on enhancing Git credential handling. These improvements include refactoring URL construction, updating token creation, enhancing error handling, introducing a function to construct repository URLs, and thorough testing to ensure robust functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
handlers.go Refactored URL construction, updated token creation, improved error handling.
internal/credentialhandler/marshal.go Added function to construct repository URLs.
.../credentialhandler/marshal_test.go Introduced tests for URL construction, covering various scenarios and error checks.

🐇✨
In the code's meadow, under the syntax tree,
A rabbit hopped by, refactoring with glee.
URLs align, errors decline,
With each test case, the code does shine.
Cheers to changes, crafted so fine! 🌟
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c6e246b and 866c471.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • handlers.go (3 hunks)
  • internal/credentialhandler/marshal.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/credentialhandler/marshal_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
handlers.go (1)

61-65: Refactoring to use ConstructRepositoryURL enhances clarity and validation.

internal/credentialhandler/marshal_test.go (1)

215-318: Comprehensive test coverage for ConstructRepositoryURL.

internal/credentialhandler/marshal.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
handlers_test.go (1)

Line range hint 138-160: Consider adding assertions to verify the constructed URL in TestHandlePostGitCredentials_ReturnsTokenOnSuccess.

This would ensure that the URL construction logic is correctly integrated and functioning as expected within the handler.

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c6e246b and 7d5213c.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • handlers.go (4 hunks)
  • handlers_test.go (3 hunks)
  • internal/credentialhandler/marshal.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/credentialhandler/marshal_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • handlers.go
  • internal/credentialhandler/marshal.go
  • internal/credentialhandler/marshal_test.go

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.73%. Comparing base (c6e246b) to head (11a072f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #25      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.98%   88.73%   +3.74%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines         413      426      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits          351      378      +27     
+ Misses         42       33       -9     
+ Partials       20       15       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Reject obviously malformed requests, and don't try
to add details if they're missing.

Git credentials helpers are invoked by Git with a
defined and stable protocol. Anything outside this
shouldn't be handled, instead rejecting as cheaply
as possible.
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c6e246b and 11a072f.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • handlers.go (4 hunks)
  • handlers_test.go (6 hunks)
  • internal/credentialhandler/marshal.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/credentialhandler/marshal_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • handlers.go
  • handlers_test.go
  • internal/credentialhandler/marshal.go
  • internal/credentialhandler/marshal_test.go

@jamestelfer jamestelfer merged commit 0ad45a9 into main May 8, 2024
3 checks passed
@jamestelfer jamestelfer deleted the handler-validation branch May 8, 2024 08:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant