Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

anovaRM: use full model if terms are not defined #409

Conversation

raviselker
Copy link
Member

Previously, the rmTerms and the bsTerms always had to be defined
by the user of jmv. This commit changes it so that if you
don't define or or both terms, the model terms will default
to the full model including all possible terms.

Other than that, I found that when running jmvtools::install(),
and running the rm anova within jamovi, jamovi complains that the
added packages are not available. Not sure whether this is a
"real" issue, but I also added a commit that fixes this (feel
free to not merge this commit, if it's not).

Fixes #397

Previously, the rmTerms and the bsTerms always had to be defined
by the user of `jmv`. This commit changes it so that if you
don't define or or both terms, the model terms will default
to the full model including all possible terms.
When running jmvtools::install(), and running the
rm anova withing jamovi, jamovi complains that the
added packages are not available. This commit
fixes this.
@jonathon-love
Copy link
Member

merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

RM ANOVA ignores between subjects terms when called from R
2 participants