-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactoring #7
Closed
Closed
Refactoring #7
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Clean up setup.py
Logger and request refactoring
Authetication cleanup
…n into phan-docstring
Documentation update
@jasonarewhy Any way I can speed up the review process to get this PR merged? |
This was actually really good thanks I was able to use this a personal project. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
This PR refactors following parts of the library:
logging
modules.request
call are cleaned up.cli.py
is added to provide a quick and dirty way to test the calls.Where should the reviewer start?
catchpoint.py
How was this tested? How can the reviewer verify your testing?
The change was manually tested on development environment using
cli.py
.NOTE:
_format_time()
is not updated and sticks out like a sore thumb. I am planning to update that method to be more robust, but haven't come up with a perfect way yet.