Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: Sort alphabetically or by highest or lowest value #2247

Open
romanogino opened this issue Aug 1, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@romanogino
Copy link

Description

In any descriptive or inferential result where there are several variables, it is convenient to sort alphabetically or by highest or lowest value. For example, in Likert scale results.

Purpose

To identify more quickly or more easily the results of interest.

Use-case

No response

Is your feature request related to a problem?

This is only a recommendation for improvement

Is your feature request related to a JASP module?

Descriptives, Factor, Frequencies, Reliability

Describe the solution you would like

A list ordered from highest to lowest, or vice versa, by numerical value and alphabetical order.

Describe alternatives that you have considered

No response

Additional context

2023-08-01_112314

@shun2wang
Copy link
Contributor

@JorisGoosen @boutinb and Don, I think it makes sense to do so, at which (R or JS) level should we add it more appropriate? One is to add a wrapper for jaspTable sort class in jaspBase, another way is to change the output result from JS?

@vandenman
Copy link
Contributor

I think this makes most sense to do in JS. There are many features that make more sense on the table itself rather than replicating them in each analysis, sorting would be one of them (the Bayes factor transformations would be another). Personally, I think that the tables from DT look good, perhaps we should try something similar?

@JorisGoosen
Copy link
Contributor

JorisGoosen commented Aug 21, 2023

I agree that js is the best idea

@tomtomme
Copy link
Member

tomtomme commented Feb 9, 2024

related #2409

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants