Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update linear-arbitrary-precision to version 4.1.0 🚀 #11

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello 👋

🚀🚀🚀

linear-arbitrary-precision just published its new version 4.1.0, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of linear-arbitrary-precision – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


The new version differs by 42 commits .

  • f712d49 4.1.0
  • f14871f feat: add abs method
  • 2fc26d4 4.0.2
  • 5cef429 docs: update reviver example
  • bf3cf26 4.0.1
  • 70a2953 docs: update reviver example
  • b95cd08 4.0.0
  • e13f951 feat: add inequality functions and update core
  • 59aff2a Merge pull request #16 from javiercejudo/greenkeeper-floating-2.0.0
  • b3eb0bb chore(package): update floating to version 2.0.0
  • 5b17c4f Merge pull request #14 from javiercejudo/greenkeeper-should-8.0.2
  • 7860f72 chore(package): update should to version 8.0.2
  • e66c3ea 3.4.0
  • a51f068 chore: update to core 2
  • ebee2b4 3.3.0

There are 42 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚡

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 11, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 7f7598c on greenkeeper-linear-arbitrary-precision-4.1.0 into 03eeb56 on master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants