Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updated mqr gbm parallel options #24

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2020
Merged

Conversation

ciaran-g
Copy link
Collaborator

included options for parallel over quantiles :) Unfortunately more duplicated similar code...will have a think about that

updated example

updated docs

#15 (comment)

included options for parallel over quantiles. Unfortunately more duplicated code...

updated example

updated docs
@jbrowell
Copy link
Owner

Yes - repeated code is not going to be sustainable... perhaps we should be writing sub-functions are nested in the parallel chunks?

@ciaran-g
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ciaran-g commented Feb 3, 2020

Definitely, think this would require the "quantile" for loop to be embedded in the parallel function at the moment, which will take a bit of re-organizing.

I will merge this for now and put this as an issue...

@ciaran-g ciaran-g merged commit bf86eda into master Feb 3, 2020
@ciaran-g ciaran-g deleted the mqr_gbm-para-over-quantiles branch February 3, 2020 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants