Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address issue with self.node artifacts ... #141

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Apr 16, 2017
Merged

Conversation

econchick
Copy link
Contributor

And apparently merge a bunch of things I forgot to commit :-!

PiDelport and others added 14 commits February 11, 2017 15:52
This is currently required for Travis to make Python 3.5 available in
the build environment.

This makes the py35 Tox env work, and should not affect the others.
4a8b003 test_main.py, test_utils.py:

    Use assert_called_once_with(), not assert_called_once()

    assert_called_once() is not actually a valid assertion method: the
    mock object treats it as a mocked method, which silently returns
    without doing anything. The right assertion method to use is
    assert_called_once_with().

    (This makes several tests fail that were falsely passing before.)

    For more about this problem, see:

    http://engineeringblog.yelp.com/2015/02/assert_called_once-threat-or-menace.html

cd18a5d test_main.py:

    Tell CliRunner.invoke() to not catch exceptions
    This makes it much easier to investigate test failures.

254486b test_main.py:

    Expand and make test_main.test_update pass

c08bef8 test_utils.py

    Update and make test_utils.test_update_mime_types pass
    This is hopefully faithful to the original intent of this test.
3453b81 test_parser.py:

    Fix hash order dependency in test_resource_assigned_type
    This makes the test pass deterministically.

9c57a40 test_parser.py:

    Fix hash order dependency in test_resource_inherits_get

    These two resources were previously listed in an unpredictable order,
    relative to each other: this way, the test does not depend on a
    particular order.

fc1269d .travis.yml, tox.ini:

    Remove hash seed hard-coding from Tox and Travis configs
    The tests should now pass without this.

4047bf7 AUTHORS.rst:

    Add myself to the contributor list
…projects

As per [their blog post of the 27th April](https://blog.readthedocs.com/securing-subdomains/) ‘Securing subdomains’:

> Starting today, Read the Docs will start hosting projects from subdomains on the domain readthedocs.io, instead of on readthedocs.org. This change addresses some security concerns around site cookies while hosting user generated data on the same domain as our dashboard.

Test Plan: Manually visited all the links I’ve modified.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 16, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #141 into v0.2.0-dev will decrease coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           v0.2.0-dev     #141      +/-   ##
==============================================
- Coverage       95.74%   95.61%   -0.13%     
==============================================
  Files              40       40              
  Lines            1950     1940      -10     
==============================================
- Hits             1867     1855      -12     
- Misses             83       85       +2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
ramlfications/utils/common.py 94.61% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
ramlfications/config.py 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
ramlfications/parser/base.py 82% <100%> (-0.36%) ⬇️
ramlfications/__main__.py 85.71% <100%> (-2.53%) ⬇️
ramlfications/__init__.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
ramlfications/parser/parser.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
ramlfications/utils/__init__.py 94.48% <0%> (-0.79%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 863fa3c...df19a71. Read the comment docs.

@econchick econchick merged commit d6458fe into v0.2.0-dev Apr 16, 2017
@econchick econchick deleted the lynn/issue-140 branch April 16, 2017 15:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants