Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lazy-load toml_edit #1594

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024
Merged

lazy-load toml_edit #1594

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

jdx
Copy link
Owner

@jdx jdx commented Feb 2, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Feb 2, 2024

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.03% 96.93%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (2baa9d9) 16401 13777 84.00%
Head commit (b9f501b) 16466 (+65) 13837 (+60) 84.03% (+0.03%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#1594) 163 158 96.93%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation

@jdx jdx force-pushed the lazy-toml-doc branch 6 times, most recently from c940ae3 to 09cfa0c Compare February 2, 2024 21:27
@jdx jdx merged commit ae658f8 into main Feb 2, 2024
1 check passed
@jdx jdx deleted the lazy-toml-doc branch February 2, 2024 21:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants