Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cu 86c0c42k4 filters are not working #687

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

brett-onions
Copy link

@brett-onions brett-onions commented Sep 25, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced transaction log fetching with improved filtering options.
    • Filters now trigger log fetching automatically based on user selections.
    • Updated menu item text for clarity.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Consolidated date filtering logic for more accurate results.
  • Documentation

    • Updated method signatures in relevant components and interfaces to reflect new parameters.

@rcrichton
Copy link
Member

Task linked: CU-86c0c42k4 Filters are not working

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce enhancements to the transaction log fetching functionality across multiple components. The fetchTransactionLogs function is updated to accept an additional optional parameter, filteredResults, which affects how transaction logs are processed. The filtering logic is reorganized for clarity, and the function is integrated into the BasicFilters and CustomFilters components, ensuring that transaction logs are fetched in response to changes in various filter states. Additionally, the relevant interfaces are updated to reflect these changes.

Changes

Files Change Summary
packages/transaction-log/src/components/common/app.main.component.tsx Updated fetchTransactionLogs to accept an additional optional parameter, filteredResults, and reorganized filtering logic for transaction logs. Modified state update logic and useEffect hook behavior.
packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/basic.component.tsx Added fetchTransactionLogs prop and implemented useEffect to trigger log fetching based on specific state variable changes. Updated a menu item text.
packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/custom.component.tsx Introduced fetchTransactionLogs as a prop with a useEffect hook for fetching logs on state changes. Updated a menu item text.
packages/transaction-log/src/interfaces/index.interface.spec.ts Added fetchTransactionLogs method to basicFilterProps and customFilterProps with specified parameters and return type.
packages/transaction-log/src/interfaces/index.interface.ts Updated BasicFilterProps and CustomFilterProps interfaces to include fetchTransactionLogs method with specified parameters and return type.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant BasicFilters
    participant CustomFilters
    participant App

    User->>BasicFilters: Change filter state
    BasicFilters->>App: Call fetchTransactionLogs
    App->>App: Process filters
    App->>App: Fetch transaction logs
    App->>User: Display updated logs

    User->>CustomFilters: Change filter state
    CustomFilters->>App: Call fetchTransactionLogs
    App->>App: Process filters
    App->>App: Fetch transaction logs
    App->>User: Display updated logs
Loading

Poem

In the meadow where logs do flow,
A rabbit hops with joy, you know!
Filters dance, and states align,
Fetching logs, oh how they shine!
With each change, a new tale spun,
Hooray for updates, let’s have some fun! 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@ItsMurumba ItsMurumba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@brett-onions brett-onions marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2024 12:12
@drizzentic
Copy link
Collaborator

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/transaction-log/src/interfaces/index.interface.ts (1)

19-19: Approve: Addition of fetchTransactionLogs method with a suggestion

The addition of the fetchTransactionLogs method to both BasicFilterProps and CustomFilterProps interfaces is a good improvement. It provides a consistent way to fetch transaction logs with optional filtering capabilities.

Consider enhancing type safety by using more specific types for the method parameters:

fetchTransactionLogs: (timestampFilter?: ISO8601String, filteredResults?: boolean) => Promise<void>

Where ISO8601String is a type alias for string that represents a valid ISO 8601 timestamp:

type ISO8601String = string;

This change would make the expected format of the timestampFilter more explicit to developers using these interfaces.

Also applies to: 51-51

packages/transaction-log/src/interfaces/index.interface.spec.ts (2)

27-28: Approve addition of fetchTransactionLogs, but suggest updating test cases.

The addition of fetchTransactionLogs to basicFilterProps is appropriate and aligns with the PR objective of addressing filter functionality. However, the existing test cases don't verify this new property.

Consider updating the test case for BasicFilterProps to include a check for the fetchTransactionLogs method. For example:

it('should conform to BasicFilterProps interface', () => {
  // ... existing checks ...
  expect(typeof basicFilterProps.fetchTransactionLogs).toBe('function')
  expect(basicFilterProps.fetchTransactionLogs()).resolves.toBeUndefined()
})

This ensures that the new property is properly tested and maintains consistency with the interface definition.


59-60: Approve addition of fetchTransactionLogs to customFilterProps, but suggest updating test cases.

The addition of fetchTransactionLogs to customFilterProps is consistent with its addition to basicFilterProps and aligns with the PR objective. However, as with basicFilterProps, the existing test cases don't verify this new property.

Consider updating the test case for CustomFilterProps to include a check for the fetchTransactionLogs method. For example:

it('should conform to CustomFilterProps interface', () => {
  // ... existing checks ...
  expect(typeof customFilterProps.fetchTransactionLogs).toBe('function')
  expect(customFilterProps.fetchTransactionLogs()).resolves.toBeUndefined()
})

This ensures that the new property is properly tested and maintains consistency with the interface definition.

packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/basic.component.tsx (1)

23-24: LGTM: New prop added correctly

The addition of the fetchTransactionLogs prop is appropriate for the new functionality. It's consistent with the component's purpose and naming conventions.

Consider adding a type annotation for the fetchTransactionLogs prop in the BasicFilterProps interface for better type safety and documentation. For example:

interface BasicFilterProps {
  // ... other props
  fetchTransactionLogs: (arg: unknown | null, forceRefresh: boolean) => void;
}
packages/transaction-log/src/components/common/app.main.component.tsx (1)

151-155: Redundant filtering on status

You are filtering newTransactionListState by status after fetching transactions where status was already applied as a filter. This could be redundant. Unless there's a specific reason for this second filter (e.g., additional in-memory transactions), consider removing it to streamline the code.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 99e7b31 and 04ae8d3.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • packages/transaction-log/src/components/common/app.main.component.tsx (5 hunks)
  • packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/basic.component.tsx (4 hunks)
  • packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/custom.component.tsx (4 hunks)
  • packages/transaction-log/src/interfaces/index.interface.spec.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/transaction-log/src/interfaces/index.interface.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
packages/transaction-log/src/interfaces/index.interface.ts (2)

18-18: LGTM: Addition of channels property

The addition of the channels: Channel[] property to the BasicFilterProps interface is a good improvement. It provides a list of available channels for filtering, which complements the existing channel and setChannel properties. This change enhances the interface's functionality for handling channel-related operations.


Line range hint 1-51: Summary: Good improvements to filter interfaces

The changes made to BasicFilterProps and CustomFilterProps interfaces are well-aligned with the PR objectives of addressing filter functionality issues. The addition of the channels property and the fetchTransactionLogs method enhances the capabilities of these interfaces for handling transaction log filtering and retrieval.

These improvements should contribute to resolving the "Filters are not working" issue mentioned in the PR summary. The changes are logically structured and consistent across both interfaces.

A minor suggestion was made to improve type safety for the timestampFilter parameter in the fetchTransactionLogs method, which could further enhance the robustness of the implementation.

Overall, these changes appear to be a step in the right direction for improving the filter functionality in the application.

packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/basic.component.tsx (4)

1-1: LGTM: Correct import of useEffect

The addition of useEffect to the import statement is appropriate for the new functionality implemented in the component.


78-78: LGTM: Improved MenuItem label

The change from "Success" to "Successful" improves clarity in the user interface. This minor text update enhances consistency and user understanding.


Line range hint 1-78: Overall assessment: Changes effectively address the filter functionality issue

The implemented changes successfully address the issue of filters not working as described in the PR objectives. The addition of the fetchTransactionLogs prop and the useEffect hook ensures that transaction logs are fetched when filter values change.

Key points:

  1. The new prop and import changes are correctly implemented.
  2. The useEffect hook correctly triggers fetches on filter changes, though it could benefit from debouncing for optimization.
  3. Minor UI improvement with the updated MenuItem label.

These changes should resolve the reported issue with filters not working. Consider implementing the suggested optimizations to further improve the component's performance and clarity.


46-48: Implement debounce for filter changes

The useEffect hook correctly triggers fetchTransactionLogs when filters change. However, this implementation might lead to unnecessary API calls if multiple filters are changed in quick succession.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Implement debouncing to reduce the number of API calls:
import { debounce } from 'lodash';

// Inside the component
const debouncedFetch = React.useMemo(
  () => debounce((forceRefresh: boolean) => fetchTransactionLogs(null, forceRefresh), 300),
  [fetchTransactionLogs]
);

useEffect(() => {
  debouncedFetch(true);
  return () => debouncedFetch.cancel();
}, [status, searchQuery, channel, limit, startDate, endDate, reruns, debouncedFetch]);
  1. Clarify the purpose of the null argument in fetchTransactionLogs. If it's not needed, consider updating the function signature to omit it.

To ensure that the lodash library is available and that debounce is used correctly in other parts of the codebase, run the following script:

packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/custom.component.tsx (3)

37-38: LGTM: New prop added correctly

The fetchTransactionLogs prop has been added to the component's prop list. This change is consistent with the component's new functionality and is correctly typed.


166-166: LGTM: Improved menu item text

The change from "Success" to "Successful" improves the grammatical correctness of the menu item. This minor UI text update enhances user experience without affecting functionality.


Line range hint 1-366: Overall assessment: Good changes with room for optimization

The changes to this component improve its functionality by adding real-time fetching of transaction logs based on filter changes. The new prop and the menu item text change are well-implemented.

The main area for improvement is the useEffect hook, which could benefit from optimization to prevent excessive API calls. Consider implementing the suggested debounce technique or a similar optimization strategy.

Remember to add comments explaining the purpose of the arguments passed to fetchTransactionLogs for better code maintainability.

packages/transaction-log/src/components/common/app.main.component.tsx (5)

66-71: Validate the timestamp filter logic

The timestamp filter is constructed using startDate and endDate. Ensure that the conditional merging with the spread operator works as intended and that the dates are correctly formatted to ISO strings. Also, confirm that the backend expects the timestamp in this format.


237-237: Potential issues with polling condition in useEffect

The condition if (timestampFilter && !startDate && !endDate) may prevent polling for new transactions when a startDate or endDate is set. If the intention is to continue polling regardless of date filters, consider revising the condition to accommodate this.

Ensure that the polling behavior aligns with user expectations when date filters are applied.


56-56: Ensure all usages of fetchTransactionLogs are updated with the new parameter

The fetchTransactionLogs function now includes an optional filteredResults parameter. Please verify that all calls to this function throughout the codebase correctly pass this new parameter where necessary.

Run the following script to find all usages of fetchTransactionLogs and check if they accommodate the new parameter:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of fetchTransactionLogs to ensure they match the updated signature.

rg --type typescript 'fetchTransactionLogs\(' -A 2 -B 2

399-399: Confirm that child components handle the updated fetchTransactionLogs function

Passing fetchTransactionLogs as a prop to BasicFilters and CustomFilters components means these components may need to handle the updated function with the new filteredResults parameter.

Ensure that:

  • The child components are updated to pass the filteredResults parameter when invoking fetchTransactionLogs, if necessary.
  • There are no unintended side effects due to the function signature change.

Run the following script to check for invocations of fetchTransactionLogs within these components:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for invocations of 'fetchTransactionLogs' in the child components.

rg --type typescript 'fetchTransactionLogs\(' -A 2 -B 2

Also applies to: 432-432


85-91: Verify the correctness of the reruns filter logic

The filters for reruns use MongoDB query operators to check for the existence and emptiness of childIDs. Confirm that:

  • For Yes, the filter { $exists: true, $ne: [] } correctly identifies transactions that have reruns.
  • For No, the filter { $eq: [] } correctly identifies transactions without reruns.

Run the following script to ensure that childIDs are used consistently:

✅ Verification successful

The reruns filter logic is correctly implemented.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for usages of 'childIDs' to verify filter logic.

rg --type typescript 'childIDs' -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 174


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for usages of 'childIDs' to verify filter logic.

rg 'childIDs' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 1403

Copy link
Collaborator

@marvinIsSacul marvinIsSacul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks alright.

@drizzentic drizzentic merged commit c57ae6f into poc-microfrontends Sep 27, 2024
3 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants