-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cu 86c0c42k4 filters are not working #687
Cu 86c0c42k4 filters are not working #687
Conversation
Task linked: CU-86c0c42k4 Filters are not working |
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes introduce enhancements to the transaction log fetching functionality across multiple components. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant BasicFilters
participant CustomFilters
participant App
User->>BasicFilters: Change filter state
BasicFilters->>App: Call fetchTransactionLogs
App->>App: Process filters
App->>App: Fetch transaction logs
App->>User: Display updated logs
User->>CustomFilters: Change filter state
CustomFilters->>App: Call fetchTransactionLogs
App->>App: Process filters
App->>App: Fetch transaction logs
App->>User: Display updated logs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/transaction-log/src/interfaces/index.interface.ts (1)
19-19
: Approve: Addition offetchTransactionLogs
method with a suggestionThe addition of the
fetchTransactionLogs
method to bothBasicFilterProps
andCustomFilterProps
interfaces is a good improvement. It provides a consistent way to fetch transaction logs with optional filtering capabilities.Consider enhancing type safety by using more specific types for the method parameters:
fetchTransactionLogs: (timestampFilter?: ISO8601String, filteredResults?: boolean) => Promise<void>Where
ISO8601String
is a type alias for string that represents a valid ISO 8601 timestamp:type ISO8601String = string;This change would make the expected format of the
timestampFilter
more explicit to developers using these interfaces.Also applies to: 51-51
packages/transaction-log/src/interfaces/index.interface.spec.ts (2)
27-28
: Approve addition offetchTransactionLogs
, but suggest updating test cases.The addition of
fetchTransactionLogs
tobasicFilterProps
is appropriate and aligns with the PR objective of addressing filter functionality. However, the existing test cases don't verify this new property.Consider updating the test case for
BasicFilterProps
to include a check for thefetchTransactionLogs
method. For example:it('should conform to BasicFilterProps interface', () => { // ... existing checks ... expect(typeof basicFilterProps.fetchTransactionLogs).toBe('function') expect(basicFilterProps.fetchTransactionLogs()).resolves.toBeUndefined() })This ensures that the new property is properly tested and maintains consistency with the interface definition.
59-60
: Approve addition offetchTransactionLogs
tocustomFilterProps
, but suggest updating test cases.The addition of
fetchTransactionLogs
tocustomFilterProps
is consistent with its addition tobasicFilterProps
and aligns with the PR objective. However, as withbasicFilterProps
, the existing test cases don't verify this new property.Consider updating the test case for
CustomFilterProps
to include a check for thefetchTransactionLogs
method. For example:it('should conform to CustomFilterProps interface', () => { // ... existing checks ... expect(typeof customFilterProps.fetchTransactionLogs).toBe('function') expect(customFilterProps.fetchTransactionLogs()).resolves.toBeUndefined() })This ensures that the new property is properly tested and maintains consistency with the interface definition.
packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/basic.component.tsx (1)
23-24
: LGTM: New prop added correctlyThe addition of the
fetchTransactionLogs
prop is appropriate for the new functionality. It's consistent with the component's purpose and naming conventions.Consider adding a type annotation for the
fetchTransactionLogs
prop in theBasicFilterProps
interface for better type safety and documentation. For example:interface BasicFilterProps { // ... other props fetchTransactionLogs: (arg: unknown | null, forceRefresh: boolean) => void; }packages/transaction-log/src/components/common/app.main.component.tsx (1)
151-155
: Redundant filtering onstatus
You are filtering
newTransactionListState
bystatus
after fetching transactions wherestatus
was already applied as a filter. This could be redundant. Unless there's a specific reason for this second filter (e.g., additional in-memory transactions), consider removing it to streamline the code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- packages/transaction-log/src/components/common/app.main.component.tsx (5 hunks)
- packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/basic.component.tsx (4 hunks)
- packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/custom.component.tsx (4 hunks)
- packages/transaction-log/src/interfaces/index.interface.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/transaction-log/src/interfaces/index.interface.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
packages/transaction-log/src/interfaces/index.interface.ts (2)
18-18
: LGTM: Addition ofchannels
propertyThe addition of the
channels: Channel[]
property to theBasicFilterProps
interface is a good improvement. It provides a list of available channels for filtering, which complements the existingchannel
andsetChannel
properties. This change enhances the interface's functionality for handling channel-related operations.
Line range hint
1-51
: Summary: Good improvements to filter interfacesThe changes made to
BasicFilterProps
andCustomFilterProps
interfaces are well-aligned with the PR objectives of addressing filter functionality issues. The addition of thechannels
property and thefetchTransactionLogs
method enhances the capabilities of these interfaces for handling transaction log filtering and retrieval.These improvements should contribute to resolving the "Filters are not working" issue mentioned in the PR summary. The changes are logically structured and consistent across both interfaces.
A minor suggestion was made to improve type safety for the
timestampFilter
parameter in thefetchTransactionLogs
method, which could further enhance the robustness of the implementation.Overall, these changes appear to be a step in the right direction for improving the filter functionality in the application.
packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/basic.component.tsx (4)
1-1
: LGTM: Correct import ofuseEffect
The addition of
useEffect
to the import statement is appropriate for the new functionality implemented in the component.
78-78
: LGTM: Improved MenuItem labelThe change from "Success" to "Successful" improves clarity in the user interface. This minor text update enhances consistency and user understanding.
Line range hint
1-78
: Overall assessment: Changes effectively address the filter functionality issueThe implemented changes successfully address the issue of filters not working as described in the PR objectives. The addition of the
fetchTransactionLogs
prop and theuseEffect
hook ensures that transaction logs are fetched when filter values change.Key points:
- The new prop and import changes are correctly implemented.
- The
useEffect
hook correctly triggers fetches on filter changes, though it could benefit from debouncing for optimization.- Minor UI improvement with the updated MenuItem label.
These changes should resolve the reported issue with filters not working. Consider implementing the suggested optimizations to further improve the component's performance and clarity.
46-48
: Implement debounce for filter changesThe
useEffect
hook correctly triggersfetchTransactionLogs
when filters change. However, this implementation might lead to unnecessary API calls if multiple filters are changed in quick succession.Consider the following improvements:
- Implement debouncing to reduce the number of API calls:
import { debounce } from 'lodash'; // Inside the component const debouncedFetch = React.useMemo( () => debounce((forceRefresh: boolean) => fetchTransactionLogs(null, forceRefresh), 300), [fetchTransactionLogs] ); useEffect(() => { debouncedFetch(true); return () => debouncedFetch.cancel(); }, [status, searchQuery, channel, limit, startDate, endDate, reruns, debouncedFetch]);
- Clarify the purpose of the
null
argument infetchTransactionLogs
. If it's not needed, consider updating the function signature to omit it.To ensure that the
lodash
library is available and that debounce is used correctly in other parts of the codebase, run the following script:packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/custom.component.tsx (3)
37-38
: LGTM: New prop added correctlyThe
fetchTransactionLogs
prop has been added to the component's prop list. This change is consistent with the component's new functionality and is correctly typed.
166-166
: LGTM: Improved menu item textThe change from "Success" to "Successful" improves the grammatical correctness of the menu item. This minor UI text update enhances user experience without affecting functionality.
Line range hint
1-366
: Overall assessment: Good changes with room for optimizationThe changes to this component improve its functionality by adding real-time fetching of transaction logs based on filter changes. The new prop and the menu item text change are well-implemented.
The main area for improvement is the useEffect hook, which could benefit from optimization to prevent excessive API calls. Consider implementing the suggested debounce technique or a similar optimization strategy.
Remember to add comments explaining the purpose of the arguments passed to
fetchTransactionLogs
for better code maintainability.packages/transaction-log/src/components/common/app.main.component.tsx (5)
66-71
: Validate the timestamp filter logicThe timestamp filter is constructed using
startDate
andendDate
. Ensure that the conditional merging with the spread operator works as intended and that the dates are correctly formatted to ISO strings. Also, confirm that the backend expects the timestamp in this format.
237-237
: Potential issues with polling condition inuseEffect
The condition
if (timestampFilter && !startDate && !endDate)
may prevent polling for new transactions when astartDate
orendDate
is set. If the intention is to continue polling regardless of date filters, consider revising the condition to accommodate this.Ensure that the polling behavior aligns with user expectations when date filters are applied.
56-56
: Ensure all usages offetchTransactionLogs
are updated with the new parameterThe
fetchTransactionLogs
function now includes an optionalfilteredResults
parameter. Please verify that all calls to this function throughout the codebase correctly pass this new parameter where necessary.Run the following script to find all usages of
fetchTransactionLogs
and check if they accommodate the new parameter:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of fetchTransactionLogs to ensure they match the updated signature. rg --type typescript 'fetchTransactionLogs\(' -A 2 -B 2
399-399
: Confirm that child components handle the updatedfetchTransactionLogs
functionPassing
fetchTransactionLogs
as a prop toBasicFilters
andCustomFilters
components means these components may need to handle the updated function with the newfilteredResults
parameter.Ensure that:
- The child components are updated to pass the
filteredResults
parameter when invokingfetchTransactionLogs
, if necessary.- There are no unintended side effects due to the function signature change.
Run the following script to check for invocations of
fetchTransactionLogs
within these components:#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for invocations of 'fetchTransactionLogs' in the child components. rg --type typescript 'fetchTransactionLogs\(' -A 2 -B 2Also applies to: 432-432
85-91
: Verify the correctness of thereruns
filter logicThe filters for
reruns
use MongoDB query operators to check for the existence and emptiness ofchildIDs
. Confirm that:
- For
Yes
, the filter{ $exists: true, $ne: [] }
correctly identifies transactions that have reruns.- For
No
, the filter{ $eq: [] }
correctly identifies transactions without reruns.Run the following script to ensure that
childIDs
are used consistently:✅ Verification successful
The
reruns
filter logic is correctly implemented.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of 'childIDs' to verify filter logic. rg --type typescript 'childIDs' -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of 'childIDs' to verify filter logic. rg 'childIDs' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 1403
packages/transaction-log/src/components/filters/custom.component.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks alright.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation