Modeling through configuration.
As we have been working on workflows and data modeling, we've encountered some problems that keep showing up:
- Consistency and variation of labels for input fields
- The label for input varies from the label for "showing" the object
- Repetitious Form objects that have a very similar structure
- Documenting an API for programatic interaction
- A nuanced conflict with SimpleForm and ActiveRecord translations when breaking apart a single concept into constituent parts
In essence, we've encountered the need for a Data Dictionary; But one that we can leverage in building our applications.
Below is a Ruby hash demonstrating how I am proposing declaring Work Types and their constituent forms in a consistent manner. I have not included, in this demonstration, more complicated concepts such as cardinality based labels, internationalization, nor input vs. display labels. However, I'm looking to isolate that behavior within a well defined "Term" object.
In the below example I am also skipping consideration for Type (i.e. String, Date, Attachment) as well as Persistence negotiation. I have a hazy plan for that but it is not yet complete.
{
work_types: [{
work_type: "ULRA Application",
contracts: [{
contexts: "ingest",
validations: [{ validator: 'Sipity::Contracts::IngestContract' }]
}],
forms: [{
form: "plan_of_study",
contracts: [{
contexts: ['submit'],
validations: [
{ key: 'ND::expected_graduation_term', required: true, inclusion: ["Summer 2016", "Fall 2016"] },
{ key: 'ND::underclass_level', required: true, inclusion: "ND::underclass_level/options" },
{ key: 'ND::major', required: true, inclusion: "https://nd.edu/api/majors.json" },
{ key: 'ND::primary_college', required: true }
]
}],
predicates: [
{ predicate: 'ND::expected_graduation_term' },
{ predicate: 'ND::underclass_level' },
{ predicate: 'ND::major' },
{ predicate: 'ND::minor' },
{ predicate: 'ND::primary_college' }
]
}, {
form: "description",
contracts: [{
contexts: ['submit'],
validations: [
{ key: 'DC::title', required: true }
]
}],
predicates: [
{ predicate: 'DC::title' },
]
}],
display: [{
regions: [
{ region: "description", predicates: [ { predicate: 'DC::title' } ] },
{ region: "plan_of_study", using_form: 'plan_of_study' }
]
}]
}],
predicates: [
{ predicate: 'DC::title', type: 'String' },
{ predicate: 'ND::underclass_level', options: ['First Year', 'Sophomore', 'Junior', 'Senior', '5th Year'], translation_key_fragment: 'ND::underclass_level' },
{ predicate: 'ND::expected_graduation_term', translation_key_fragment: 'ND::ulra.expected_graduation_term' },
{ predicate: 'ND::major', translation_key_fragment: 'ND::major' },
{ predicate: 'ND::minor', translation_key_fragment: 'ND::minor' },
{ predicate: 'ND::primary_college', translation_key_fragment: 'ND::primary_college', indexing_strategies: ['text'] }
]
}
Another key consideration is thinking about the translations. It gets rather gnarly but providing proper guidance is vital. I'm looking at what it means to keep things "close"; The translation_key_fragment is one aspect of keeping translations close. The second is contexts for reasonable fallback.
en:
predicates:
dc_title:
ulra:
label:
hint:
label:
hint:
form:
label:
hint:
display:
label:
hint:
- Rendering
- Render input fields in predictable order
- Leverage translations for label and hints
- Each field can render via SimpleForm parameters
- Attributes
- Existing predicates and corresponding values are accessible
- Keep the intersection of user given terms and available predicates
- Validation
- Validate predicate values
- Required
- Inclusion
- Array
- Validate predicate values
- Submission
- Pass the resulting data structure to a repository layer
- Rendering
- Render regions and predicates in predictable order
- Leverage translations for label and hints
- Apply coercion to the form and display object when the attributes are loaded from the buffer