Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Readabilty + Documentation Tweaks && Add Index #1

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 14, 2016
Merged

Conversation

zspecza
Copy link
Collaborator

@zspecza zspecza commented Jun 14, 2016

  • Adds support for index argument
  • Fixes the link in the readme that links to my profile
  • Adds better readability
  • Adds better documentation

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling f6cdf9e on ddw.tweaks into 667d85b on master.

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Map, reduce, forEach, and filter for objects. Lazy evaluation, no dependencies.

I wanted a library that has no dependencies and gives me the basic map/reduce/filter for use on objects. Any existing library I found has boatloads of dependencies, provides tons more extra tools, and/or is unmaintained. So here's `ObjectFn`, just for you!

Also, big props to [@declandewet](https://github.com/jescalan) for the initial implementation of this library!
Also, big props to [@declandewet](https://github.com/declandewet) for the initial implementation of this library!
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hahaha oh man honestly that was not on purpose hahah, must have mis-pasted

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I figured :P I'm not bothered tbh - this is what package.json contributors & maintainers and contributors.md & maintainers.md are for :)

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling afe4acb on ddw.tweaks into 667d85b on master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants