Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Revert breaking changes for detectOpenHandles #14789

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 1, 2024

Conversation

liuxingbaoyu
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Fixes: #14788

Test plan

CI Green

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 28, 2023

Deploy Preview for jestjs ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 838dc91
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/jestjs/deploys/65923b0947713e0008d6c1fc
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-14789--jestjs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@liuxingbaoyu liuxingbaoyu changed the title fix: Revert breaking changes to detectOpenHandles fix: Revert breaking changes for detectOpenHandles Dec 28, 2023
CHANGELOG.md Outdated
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
- `[@jest/core]` [**BREAKING**] Group together open handles with the same stack trace ([#13417](https://github.com/jestjs/jest/pull/13417), & [#14543](https://github.com/jestjs/jest/pull/14543))
- `[@jest/core]` Add `perfStats` to surface test setup overhead ([#14622](https://github.com/jestjs/jest/pull/14622))
- `[@jest/core]` [**BREAKING**] Changed `--filter` to accept an object with shape `{ filtered: Array<string> }` to match [documentation](https://jestjs.io/docs/cli#--filterfile) ([#13319](https://github.com/jestjs/jest/pull/13319))
- `[@jest/core]` [**BREAKING**] Revert breaking changes for `detectOpenHandles`. ([#14789](https://github.com/jestjs/jest/pull/14789))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this entry be grouped with the line on line 10?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this looks good to me.
Also the original second PR on line 10 seemed to be irrelevant, so I replaced it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might also be able to remove [**BREAKING**].

@SimenB
Copy link
Member

SimenB commented Dec 29, 2023

seems a test is timing out on CI now

Copy link
Member

@SimenB SimenB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@SimenB SimenB merged commit bfbb45c into jestjs:main Jan 1, 2024
73 checks passed
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 1, 2024

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 1, 2024
@SimenB
Copy link
Member

SimenB commented Feb 20, 2024

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Regression in detectOpenHandles for DNSCHANNEL
2 participants