Use reuseForks=false instead of forkMode=pertest #16
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
To fix the following warnings: ``` [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.19.1:test (default-test) @ sezpoz --- [WARNING] The parameter forkMode is deprecated since version 2.14. Use forkCount and reuseForks instead. ``` Not specifying forkCount=1, given it's the default. Cf. http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/fork-options-and-parallel-execution.html#Migrating_the_Deprecated_forkMode_Parameter_to_forkCount_and_reuseForks
jvz
approved these changes
Jan 29, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To fix the following warnings:
Not specifying forkCount=1, given it's the default.
Cf. http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/fork-options-and-parallel-execution.html#Migrating_the_Deprecated_forkMode_Parameter_to_forkCount_and_reuseForks
And https://stackoverflow.com/a/40096619/345845 that nicely clarifies that
pertestactually is synonymous toalways.@jglick