You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Manually entered transactions (set in the future) are displayed exactly like generated/forecasted transactions, where the arrow (<) would typically indicate "by/before this date".
However, for non-generated transactions, that is not right. You entered the transaction and gave it a date, specifically, so that date is the date and not just an estimation. This should be clearly visible, and I think we do that by just getting rid of the little arrow (or exchanging it with !).
Here's an example (assuming date is 2020/02/13):
~ $ 0.95 < 2020/02/24 JNJ
I think this would be better:
~ $ 0.95 2020/02/24 JNJ
This seems simple, but the problem is that we currently have no way of distinguishing between a concrete, manually entered transaction and a generated transaction (e.g. Transaction vs. FutureTransaction). That needs to be solved first, I'd say.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Manually entered transactions (set in the future) are displayed exactly like generated/forecasted transactions, where the arrow (
<
) would typically indicate "by/before this date".However, for non-generated transactions, that is not right. You entered the transaction and gave it a date, specifically, so that date is the date and not just an estimation. This should be clearly visible, and I think we do that by just getting rid of the little arrow (or exchanging it with
!
).Here's an example (assuming date is 2020/02/13):
I think this would be better:
This seems simple, but the problem is that we currently have no way of distinguishing between a concrete, manually entered transaction and a generated transaction (e.g.
Transaction
vs.FutureTransaction
). That needs to be solved first, I'd say.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: