Suggestion: shift-O should respect alignment of previous line #103
Assignees
Labels
Comments
jmacdonald
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 17, 2018
Previously, we'd only consult the current line when determining indentation for a new line. If the current line is blank, we don't indent the new line at all; this is the wrong choice if the current line is in an indented block. We now search backwards from the current line, looking for a non-blank line, and base the new line's indentation off of the that. Fixes #103.
|
Thanks for the context, @jonathandturner. I've updated the heuristic used in those commands to search backwards for the nearest non-blank line's indent and use that, rather than simply taking the current line's. This also fixes the scenario in which you'd hit |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This might be a bit of vim muscle memory, but I noticed that if I hit
o, I'd get the cursor indented on the new line at the same level as the current line. If, instead, I doshift-O, I don't get the indent of the previous line. Instead, I seem to get the indent of the current line.Might be my workflow here, but I'm often on a blank line and want to add something to the previous line when I hit shift-O. Might be nice to make it the mirror of hitting
ofrom the previous line.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: