This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 29, 2021. It is now read-only.
http4s 0.23 support #387
Merged
http4s 0.23 support #387
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Compiles for all the crossScalaVersions
+1 |
|
Just to confirm for @ChristopherDavenport , all tests pass and you've tried this out locally? This would be great to use for the latest http4s projects, and I agree that lots of people/orgs are waiting for tsec to support Scala 3 -- I'd love to see this get merged! 😄 |
|
This has passed locally, I'm merging. We are moving to davenverse and trying to release from the new org. As I'm not an admin on this repo, this is necessary for this build to get sufficiently modernized. |
|
Fantastic - thank you @ChristopherDavenport ! very excited for the new release |
|
For those following, I can now see this released as: |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Internalclass), and defining implicit types explicitly.Please if you can release this asap :-) quite a few people (and organizations) are waiting for this!
Closes #379