-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Packet capture data #1
Comments
Yes!
…On Jan 19, 2017 22:50, "Daniel Cousens" ***@***.***> wrote:
I recently captured some interaction with my Instax using a Remote
Virtual Interface
<https://developer.apple.com/library/content/qa/qa1176/_index.html>.
Is it worth posting the PCAP files here for inspection?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIhHYUv3Z8sYLPvXrVKfvBQDaFbfe2Yks5rUFlFgaJpZM4Lo_eW>
.
|
@dorkmatt :(, someone just referenced me some relevant sections of Australian copyright law (regarding this), and I'm not sure where I sit with this now... sigh. |
@dcousens That's a shame, out of interest do you have a link to those sections? It would be interesting to have a look to see if there is any way around this. |
I'm mostly looking at https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016C00741,
The general web has a lot of out-dated content, many of which don't seem to account for 47D in recent times. edit: I think it should be OK? The resulting product/work is purely intended to inter-operate with the original product (the Instax SP-2)... I'll see if I can't get some legal advice proper... |
Hi Chaps, Thanks for your interest in this, after a bit of a search myself, I can see how this project is in a bit of a legal grey area EFF Reverse Engineering FAQ As such, I've made this repository private for now until we can be sure that I / we wouldn't get in any trouble with Fujifilm. I want to make sure that this is done by the book so am currently looking for some legal advice as well. Ideally I'd love for Fujifilm to be aware / happy about the existence of this project. I feel like as a business they wouldn't have anything to loose by us doing this, and in fact it could be good for them as it may encourage others to go out and purchase an SP-2 (You never know!). Once I've got some basic advice, I'm going to reach out to them to see how they feel about it and if I can convince them to give their blessing. If all goes well, I'll make the project public again and will continue working on the python module. |
I think reaching out to Fujifilm would remove any ambiguity given the open source, non commercial nature of the project. Thanks for keeping me in the loop @jpwsutton 👍 |
@jpwsutton how'd you go? |
So I sent an email but haven't received any response in the last month. At this point I'm tempted to assume that they don't care and so it's probably ok to carry on with development. If at any point they do respond, then we can take it from there. |
I don't have this data any more, but if I find it again I'll post it 👍 |
I recently captured some interaction with my Instax using a Remote Virtual Interface.
Namely, I printed out two different photos of different resolutions (as per their source images), but noted that the resultant image sent was fixed size.
Is it worth posting the PCAP files here for inspection?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: