Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[KinematicInertialObserver] Use state observation #388

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2023

Conversation

arntanguy
Copy link
Collaborator

Replace custom implementation of mergeRoll1Pitch1WithYaw2 with state-observation's implementation now that it is a dependency of mc_rtc.

I tested in simulation, will test with HRP4 this afternoon.

Replace custom implementation of mergeRollWithYawPitch with
state-observation's implementation
@gergondet gergondet merged commit 45c0ae3 into jrl-umi3218:master Sep 6, 2023
20 checks passed
gergondet added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
Added
---

- [bindings] Add bindings for ControllerClient (#384)
- [mc_rtc] Allow to override existing log entries (#383)
- [mc_rtc] Allow "chunky" XY plot updates (#386)
- [mc_solver] ConstraintSet now has an update mechanism (#381)
- [Samples: CoM] Support the Pepper robot

Changes
---

- [StabilizerTask] Improve force distribution and CoP horizon reference (#375)
- [mc_rbdyn] Convex objects are now automatically updated (#385)
- [mc_solver] Collision constraint automatically display distance arrows when the distance falls below the interaction distance (#381)

Fixes
---

- [bindings] Fix build for Cython >= 3.0.0
- [cmake] Fix issue with yaml-cpp >= 0.8.0
- [mc_control] Fix logging of plugin performances (#383)
- [mc_observers] KinematicInertial uses function from state-observation (#388)
- [mc_rbdyn] Fix loading of devices with canonical robots (#379)
- [mc_rbdyn] Fix compilation with geos >= 3.12.0
- [Replay] Fix output replay on fixed-based robots
- [Replay] Avoid precision issue when comparing controller timestep with replay timestep
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants