You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issues raised by a user in an email with the functions in banking:
(1) you take the atan() of raw slopes, but in Cleveland (1993) the weighted average absolute orientation criterion is with normalised slopes, that is they are scaled by their range
(2) you calculate the length of line segments as independent of the aspect ratio, but Cleveland (1993) clealry shows the weight as a function of the aspect ratio
(3) why do you optimize the square of the mean (^2) ?
and
explain why you omitted to square the LOR and GOR criteria in bank_slopes_gor and bank_slopes_lor, as shown in Heer and Agrawala (2006)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I could not get the optimization for ao, lor, and gor to work reliabily.
Since these do not produce results much different than either median or
absolute slope banking, I'm removing them.
This closes#62
I take atan(slopes / alpha) which effectively normalizes them.
That was a mistake - I forgot to normalize them.
That was to take a squared distance between the mean and 45 degrees. I could have used a root finder instead.
It was a mistake to omit those.
After working through the code, I had too many issues getting the various methods involving optimization to find their maxima. I'm removing the methods for lor, gor, and ao. If they are specified, the function will use ms instead with a warning.
Issues raised by a user in an email with the functions in
banking
:and
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: