Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Return source pointer '/data/attributes' if attribute was not supplied in payload #94

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JoeWoodward
Copy link

This PR fixes the source pointer when the payload is missing a validated attribute.

e.g.

class User
  validates :name, presence: true
end

class UsersController
  deserializable_resource :user

  def create
    user = User.new(user_params)
    if user.save
      render jsonapi: user
    else
      render jsonapi_errors: user.errors
    end 
  end

  private
  
  def user_params
    params.require(:user).permit(:name)
  end
end

if we post

{
  data: {
    attributes: {}
  }
}

We get back an error with an empty pointer

{
  "errors": [
    {
      "title": "Invalid name",
      "detail": "Name can't be blank",
      "source": {}
    }
  ],
  "jsonapi": {
    "version": "1.0"
  }
}

With this change we return the node where the attribute is missing from

{
  "errors": [
    {
      "title": "Invalid name",
      "detail": "Name can't be blank",
      "source": {
        "pointer": "/data/attributes"
      }
    }
  ],
  "jsonapi": {
    "version": "1.0"
  }
}

@JoeWoodward JoeWoodward force-pushed the feature/infer_source_from_errors branch from 94965a5 to 3c197dd Compare September 2, 2018 13:12
@JoeWoodward
Copy link
Author

JoeWoodward commented Sep 2, 2018

Should we override the error description if the pointer is missing? http://jsonapi.org/examples/#error-objects-source-usage the example here returns a description

"detail": "Missing data Member at document's top level."
which maybe makes more sense. Then supply the original error in the meta

i.e.

{
  "errors": [
    {
      "detail": "Missing `name` Member at document's /data/attributes level",
      "source": {
        "pointer": "/data/attributes"
      },
      "meta": {
        "detailed_error_message": {
          "title": "Invalid name",
          "detail": "Name cannot be blank"
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "jsonapi": {
    "version": "1.0"
  }
}

Maybe the meta is overkill. Probably enough to just override the detail and remote the title

@beauby
Copy link
Member

beauby commented Apr 5, 2019

IIRC, the /data pointer should always be valid, unless the payload itself is invalid (to be double checked), in which case we could add some logic to craft the right pointer/error depending on the payload (/data vs /data/attributes).

@JoeWoodward
Copy link
Author

I think that's the issue though. The following is a valid payload

{
  data: {
    attributes: {}
  }
}

Even if the logic was changed to consider this invalid we can still get null pointers with missing attributes. e.g.

{
  data: {
    type: 'users',
    attributes: {
      email: 'valid@mail.com'
      # name: 'expected but not passed at all, not just null'
    }
  }
}
{
  "errors": [
    {
      "title": "Invalid name",
      "detail": "Name can't be blank",
      "source": {}
    }
  ],
  "jsonapi": {
    "version": "1.0"
  }
}

There is an issue with this PR though; The error isn't necessarily going to be from a member on /data/attributes. I actually looked back at this repo because I was researching sideposting, which I believe isn't through the attributes node so returning source: { pointer: '/data/attributes' } would be invalid.

Maybe there's a way to decipher the pointer from the AM::Errors hash. Need to look into it further

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants