Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explicitly remove created SAAS in cmr tests #15857

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2023

Conversation

jack-w-shaw
Copy link
Member

Occasionally we fail to remove the secondary controller in the cross_controller cmr test. Explicilty remoing the SAAS before destroying helps to resolve this

https://jenkins.juju.canonical.com/job/test-cmr-test-offer-consume-lxd/731/

Checklist

  • [ ] Code style: imports ordered, good names, simple structure, etc
  • Comments saying why design decisions were made
  • [ ] Go unit tests, with comments saying what you're testing
  • Integration tests, with comments saying what you're testing
  • [ ] doc.go added or updated in changed packages

QA steps

./main.sh -v -c lxd -p lxd cmr

Occassionally we fail to remove the secondary controller in the
cross_controller cmr test. Explicilty remoing the SAAS before destroying
helps to resolve this
Copy link
Member

@nvinuesa nvinuesa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jack-w-shaw
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@jujubot jujubot merged commit 89f1891 into juju:2.9 Jul 4, 2023
4 of 5 checks passed
@jack-w-shaw jack-w-shaw deleted the explicitly_remove_saas_in_cmr_test branch July 5, 2023 08:48
@jack-w-shaw jack-w-shaw mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2023
jujubot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2023
@jack-w-shaw jack-w-shaw mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2023
jujubot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
#15866

Merges:
- #15852
- #15854
- #15849
- #15855
- #15857
- #15861
- #15825

One conflict in `cmd/juju/application/deployer/bundlehandler.go`
This was referenced Jul 6, 2023
jujubot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2023
#15881

Merges:
- #15845
- #15852
- #15854
- #15849
- #15855
- #15857
- #15861
- #15862
- #15825
- #15866
- #15863
- #15870
- #15871
- #15872
- #15873
- #15874
- #15875

One substantial conflict in `cmd/juju/application/deployer/bundlehandler.go` & `cmd/juju/application/deployer/bundlehandler_test.go`, resulting in failing unit tests.

The conflict relates to this PR:
- #15825

These were fixed by the two tops commits

### QA Steps

Ensure all unit tests pass
```
go test github.com/juju/juju/cmd/juju/application/deployer
go test github.com/juju/juju/core/charm
go test github.com/juju/juju/apiserver/facades/client/application
```

Ensure we can deploy a complex bundle
```
juju deploy kubeflow
```
@hpidcock hpidcock mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2023
jujubot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2023
#15896

Forward ports:
- #15845
- #15725
- #15852
- #15854
- #15849
- #15855
- #15857
- #15861
- #15862
- #15860
- #15864
- #15825
- #15866
- #15863
- #15870
- #15871
- #15872
- #15873
- #15874
- #15876
- #15875
- #15881
- #15727
- #15883
- #15884
- #15880
- #15879
- #15886
- #15887
- #15877
- #15888
- #15893
- #15894

Conflicts:
- cmd/juju/ssh/debugcode_test.go
- cmd/juju/ssh/debughooks_test.go
- cmd/juju/ssh/scp_unix_test.go
- cmd/juju/ssh/ssh_machine.go
- cmd/juju/ssh/ssh_machine_test.go
- cmd/juju/ssh/ssh_unix_test.go
- worker/dbaccessor/worker.go
- caas/kubernetes/provider/k8s_test.go
- caas/kubernetes/provider/operator_test.go
- caas/kubernetes/provider/package_test.go
- caas/kubernetes/provider/rbac.go
- cmd/juju/application/deployer/bundlehandler.go
- cmd/juju/application/deployer/bundlehandler_test.go
- cmd/jujud/agent/model/manifolds.go
- core/bundle/changes/changes.go
- worker/caasapplicationprovisioner/application.go
- worker/caasapplicationprovisioner/application_test.go
- worker/caasapplicationprovisioner/mock_test.go
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants