-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 497
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge 3.1 into 3.2 #15886
Merged
Merged
Merge 3.1 into 3.2 #15886
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The following allow migrating to a new version of juju without explicitly stating the newer major version (3.x -> 4.x). Juju shouldn't have to know about new major versions, so to fix this, we check that it's not in the version map, before checking if we're moving to a larger major version. This is required as 3.1 has been ear marked as the last LTS before releasing 4.0. The target controller will then validate where the model is coming from, and ensure it's with it's own range before allowing it to migrate.
The prior code had logic from the 2.9 branch. We can remove the branching logic and just rely on the fact that the current version can never downgrade.
This removes the hack to upgrade version, instead just remove all source checks for source requests.
The following removes the target version from source prechecking. The source check should __never__ know about the version it's moving to. The source doesn't care. The target cares. Removing this logic is the first step of cleaning all of this up. Inreality we should send a big set of information for the target controller to validate. Nothing should be checked on the source.
The following code is just not used anymore because we're no longer checking the source.
…e-sink juju#15876 There seems to be an issue with xenial on AWS, which seems to happen frequently in these jobs. Trying jammy to see if it is actually a xenial issue. ## QA steps Run tests. ## Documentation changes N/A ## Bug reference https://jenkins.juju.canonical.com/job/test-cmr-test-offer-consume-aws/761/consoleText
…new-version juju#15727 The following allows migrating to a new version of juju without explicitly stating the newer major version (3.x -> 4.x). Juju shouldn't have to know about new major versions, so to fix this requires removing the code that was recently added to pass the target controller version to the source pre-checks. In addition to this, I've also refactored the migration precheck context types to not allow target pre-check to explicitly know about model checking. This should prevent any target and source issues. This is required as 3.1 was earmarked as the last LTS before releasing 4.0. The target controller will then validate where the model is coming from, and ensure it's within its own range before allowing it to migrate. ## Checklist - [x] Code style: imports ordered, good names, simple structure, etc - [x] Comments saying why design decisions were made - [x] Go unit tests, with comments saying what you're testing ## QA steps We require this [PR](juju#15715) one to land before we can fully test the workflow. To ensure we didn't break any backward compatibility: ```sh $ sudo snap install juju --channel 3.0/stable $ juju bootstrap lxd test30 $ juju add-model default $ juju deploy ubuntu $ sudo snap remove juju --purge $ make go-install $ juju bootstrap lxd test31 $ juju switch controller $ juju wait-for application controller $ juju switch test30 $ juju wait-for application ubuntu $ sleep 10 $ juju migrate default test31 $ juju switch test31 $ sleep 10 $ juju switch default $ juju wait-for application ubuntu ```
- add String() function to executeResults - add GITHUB_TOKEN to workflow
juju#15883 Notify the *committer* instead of the commit *author*. This should fix the case where e.g. person X (committer) backports person Y's (author) commits. Person X should be notified here. Furthermore, for each commit, check if it is already part of an open merge, and skip in this case. Finally, some small QoL improvements to error log formatting. Tested my changes locally and [here](https://github.com/barrettj12/juju/actions/runs/5502076733/jobs/10026091361).
juju#15884 Merges the following patches: - juju#15883 - juju#15876 ### Conflicts - tests/suites/model/multi.sh
hpidcock
approved these changes
Jul 10, 2023
/merge |
Merged
Merged
jujubot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2023
#15896 Forward ports: - #15845 - #15725 - #15852 - #15854 - #15849 - #15855 - #15857 - #15861 - #15862 - #15860 - #15864 - #15825 - #15866 - #15863 - #15870 - #15871 - #15872 - #15873 - #15874 - #15876 - #15875 - #15881 - #15727 - #15883 - #15884 - #15880 - #15879 - #15886 - #15887 - #15877 - #15888 - #15893 - #15894 Conflicts: - cmd/juju/ssh/debugcode_test.go - cmd/juju/ssh/debughooks_test.go - cmd/juju/ssh/scp_unix_test.go - cmd/juju/ssh/ssh_machine.go - cmd/juju/ssh/ssh_machine_test.go - cmd/juju/ssh/ssh_unix_test.go - worker/dbaccessor/worker.go - caas/kubernetes/provider/k8s_test.go - caas/kubernetes/provider/operator_test.go - caas/kubernetes/provider/package_test.go - caas/kubernetes/provider/rbac.go - cmd/juju/application/deployer/bundlehandler.go - cmd/juju/application/deployer/bundlehandler_test.go - cmd/jujud/agent/model/manifolds.go - core/bundle/changes/changes.go - worker/caasapplicationprovisioner/application.go - worker/caasapplicationprovisioner/application_test.go - worker/caasapplicationprovisioner/mock_test.go
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Merges the following patches:
Conflicts