-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Analysis of UX survey results #24
Conversation
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
/me subscribes to this thread |
/me too |
In prep for the dev meeting, @aluu317 and @peller created another version of the same UX survey report using the declarative widgets to provide more interactivity. It's now also in the PR (which I think needs some serious squashing at this point.) I plan on working on the Binder updates to account for it. I'll also make sure it lives on jupyter.cloudet.xyz as a giant demo of dashboards, decl widgets, etc. for those that want to play with. Before I do all the work against this repo / PR, it would be nice to address the question of whether the analysis notebooks, intermediate data, etc. should be merged here in jupyter/design alongside the raw data or not. Any opinions? New obligatory eyecandy screen cap: |
I'd certainly like to see it in this repo, in context. Otherwise, a link to yet another repo seems fine. |
I'm +1 on merging this here, I would only suggest having a very short REAMDE.md file that helps people who land on it on Github to orient themselves. It can be as simple as:
No need to replicate in the README the great content that's in the included notebooks, it should really be a 5 minute job to have it in. BTW, the top-level PR description already has 80% of that README :) With that, I'd be happy merging. |
+1, I'm fine even merging that and iterating on subsequent PR if needed. Would that help you ? |
Any objection to give commit right to @parente for this repository ? |
Makes a lot of sense. Yes.
Working all in this PR is fine be me. Just wanted a sanity check before starting to point all the links in the notebook, binder, etc. to this repo if the decision was going to be "put it elsewhere." Here's what I'd like to do to get to merge:
At that point, if everyone else is +1, then by all means send it in. 👍 |
Sounds like a good plan, go ahead with that and we can merge. Delighted @parente commit rights here, if you think you'll be working often on this repo... If you think this is a one-off contribution, probably no need to. Just let us know! |
I doubt I'll be in here often. I'm cool with PR only for now. Thanks! |
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
notebook (c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
Refer to later notebooks (c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
…erflowing, fix indentation (c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
* Show text in paragraphs, not table * Some minor styling improvements * "unit tests" in the 5_utils notebook * Use survey-explorer for all questions (c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
* Show where sample will render * Add custom label orders / names to match ipy version (c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
(c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
* Merge link tags into single cell * Simplify list of execution environments (leave out binder for now) (c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
Base image has old conda libs, incompat with versions we need, and we're relying on bleeding edge widgets dev build for declwidgets to fix some bugs, so stick with jupyter.cloudet.xyz only for now (c) Copyright IBM Corp. 2016
Sounds like everyone was happy with merging this. Fire away! |
@jtyberg and I have been chipping away at this analysis for a month now. It's reached steady-state. This PR has:
report_dashboard.ipynb
which summarizes the results, can be viewed on nbviewer / github as a static report, and has interactive widgets / a dashboard layout if the reader wants to interact with the results. (Shortcut to the file in our branch to easy viewing on GitHub: https://github.com/ibm-et/design/blob/analysis/surveys/2015-notebook-ux/analysis/report_dashboard.ipynb)bindera tmpnb site: http://jupyter.cloudet.xyz/files/2015-notebook-ux-survey/analysis/deployed_dashboard/index.html. (Setting up binder instance was a bit harder because of the older image. Can tackle later.)I've marked it a WIP for a few reasons:
Any and all feedback / comments welcome. (We can post back to the list about it before or after merging if that makes sense.)
/cc @fperez @ellisonbg